Get ready—Clifford's about to make some serious moves and leave bonk in the dust.



Honestly? There's not much bonk can do to counter this momentum. Their recent plays have been pretty underwhelming, mostly just propping up bundled projects that don't have real legs. Take daddy or usd1 for example—classic pump schemes without substance.

Meanwhile, Clifford's positioning looks way stronger. The contrast is hard to ignore.
BONK2.51%
DADDY0.06%
USD10.02%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GameFiCriticvip
· 7h ago
Bonk's recent performance really disappoints... Looking at those bundled projects, it's basically just aircoin packaging tricks. Projects like daddy and usd1, from a token deflation model perspective, are fundamentally unsustainable; player retention data must be disastrous. Conversely, Clifford has put effort into balancing incentives and economic models, with a clearly superior quality leverage. This comparison is like a reshuffle in a mature gaming market—projects without sustainable growth support will inevitably be phased out. --- This kind of rug-pulling scheme really needs to disappear. --- So the key is how long ROI efficiency and user experience can sustain, not just market hype for a moment. --- Honestly, Bonk’s operational approach is just stacking and bundling, with no real innovation in gameplay. In contrast, Clifford at least has some ideas in product lifecycle planning.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 20h ago
Nah Bonk should have been surpassed long ago; I'm tired of Daddy's tricks.
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocityTraumavip
· 12-10 18:17
NGL, Bonk really underperformed this time, still sticking to the old tricks.
View OriginalReply0
LazyDevMinervip
· 12-10 18:15
I'm already tired of the tricks with bonk; I just know it's all about these fancy but pointless things.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlarmvip
· 12-10 18:04
On-chain data has long made it clear that the large addresses holding Bonk started diversifying last year. There's a lot of risk with the USD1 contract. I actually want to see how concentrated Clifford's funds are.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueenvip
· 12-10 17:59
The bonk projects I scanned the bytecode for are all prone to stack overflow vulnerabilities. Clifford's contract architecture is indeed much clearer, and overflow checks are also more standardized. However, it depends on the audit report.
View OriginalReply0
RetiredMinervip
· 12-10 17:51
bonk is really going to underperform this time... Clifford's move this time is indeed exceptional
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)