Why do so many Web3 projects fade into obscurity? The answer's simpler than you'd think—most fail to create tangible value for actual users, whether they're crypto natives or traditional Web2 folks.
Think back a few months. RWA (Real World Assets) wasn't just another buzzword—it had staying power. Projects in that space delivered something rare: practical benefits that bridged both worlds. Users could actually feel the impact, not just speculate on potential.
That's the difference between projects that build momentum and those that burn out fast. Real-world utility isn't optional anymore—it's the baseline. If your protocol doesn't solve a problem people actually have, you're just adding noise to an already crowded ecosystem.
The winners? They stop obsessing over tokenomics and start asking: what changes when someone uses this?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeePhobia
· 12-10 11:49
I've said it before, those projects that only hype concepts won't last long. RWA is indeed powerful. Instead of constantly hyping up worthless tokens, we need to focus on delivering something practical.
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketTeam
· 12-10 11:48
Basically, the projects that cut leeks all end up disappearing, only truly useful things can survive.
This wave of RWA has really found a way out; solving real problems is much more valuable than bragging.
The tokenomics approach is long outdated; now it's about whether it can truly change people's lives, otherwise it's just air tokens.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFatigue
· 12-10 11:30
Basically, there are just too many scam coins. No matter how good the hype sounds, it's all useless. RWA is indeed different; at least you can touch it.
---
Another bunch of projects that have gone to zero. Who's to blame? It's just because they haven't truly solved the problem.
---
I just want to ask, how many project founders actually use their own products?
---
The phrase "actual value," how many projects have even heard of it?
---
When RWA was popular, I was quite optimistic. Now it's just drowned out by new concepts... If the ecosystem continues like this, no one will last long.
---
Stop bragging. As long as you can make money, that's fine. Don't bother with all the fluff.
Why do so many Web3 projects fade into obscurity? The answer's simpler than you'd think—most fail to create tangible value for actual users, whether they're crypto natives or traditional Web2 folks.
Think back a few months. RWA (Real World Assets) wasn't just another buzzword—it had staying power. Projects in that space delivered something rare: practical benefits that bridged both worlds. Users could actually feel the impact, not just speculate on potential.
That's the difference between projects that build momentum and those that burn out fast. Real-world utility isn't optional anymore—it's the baseline. If your protocol doesn't solve a problem people actually have, you're just adding noise to an already crowded ecosystem.
The winners? They stop obsessing over tokenomics and start asking: what changes when someone uses this?