Would you trust algorithms to run your government? Turns out, a surprising chunk of younger demographics might be cool with that idea.
A recent survey dropped some eyebrow-raising numbers: 41% of young voters are actually down with letting AI handle government decisions. Not as a sci-fi fantasy—as a legitimate governance model.
This isn't just about tech enthusiasm. It reflects growing frustration with traditional political systems and a belief that machine learning could cut through bureaucratic nonsense. Younger generations, who grew up with smartphones and recommendation algorithms, seem less spooked by the idea of code making calls.
But here's the tension: decentralization advocates have been pushing for power distribution away from centralized authorities. So does AI governance mean hyper-centralization through code, or could it actually enable transparent, rule-based systems that legacy institutions can't corrupt?
The numbers suggest generational shifts in how we think about trust, authority, and decision-making infrastructure. Whether that's utopian or dystopian probably depends on who writes the algorithms—and whether we can audit them.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SeeYouInFourYears
· 12-10 16:27
AI ruling the country? Wake up, this is just dictatorship in the new era.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 12-10 03:44
41% of young people want AI to govern the country? Belch... It depends on who writes the code, black box decision-making is more terrifying than bureaucracy
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBuster
· 12-10 03:43
Algorithmic governance? 41% of young people really dare to bet on this? I see, instead of believing in code, it is better to believe in human nature... Anyway, it had to be overturned
View OriginalReply0
NotAFinancialAdvice
· 12-10 03:42
Algorithmic governance? To put it bluntly, it is to transfer power from politicians to programmers, which I find quite ironic
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 12-10 03:39
41% of young people want AI to run the government? Laugh to death, isn't this the generation fed by the recommendation algorithm that has begun to believe that "the code won't lie to me"
View OriginalReply0
CommunityJanitor
· 12-10 03:32
Algorithmic governance? Isn't this just a different form of centralization of power, laughing to death, really the code will not be manipulated?
View OriginalReply0
MergeConflict
· 12-10 03:27
Algorithmic governance? 41% of young people actually agree... How do I think this is the centralization of using code for a vest?
Would you trust algorithms to run your government? Turns out, a surprising chunk of younger demographics might be cool with that idea.
A recent survey dropped some eyebrow-raising numbers: 41% of young voters are actually down with letting AI handle government decisions. Not as a sci-fi fantasy—as a legitimate governance model.
This isn't just about tech enthusiasm. It reflects growing frustration with traditional political systems and a belief that machine learning could cut through bureaucratic nonsense. Younger generations, who grew up with smartphones and recommendation algorithms, seem less spooked by the idea of code making calls.
But here's the tension: decentralization advocates have been pushing for power distribution away from centralized authorities. So does AI governance mean hyper-centralization through code, or could it actually enable transparent, rule-based systems that legacy institutions can't corrupt?
The numbers suggest generational shifts in how we think about trust, authority, and decision-making infrastructure. Whether that's utopian or dystopian probably depends on who writes the algorithms—and whether we can audit them.