Recently, the issue of whether Zcash can be traced has come up again, and Yuxian from SlowMist specifically came out to explain it. Actually, Zcash was never designed to be "fully anonymous for everyone" from the very beginning—it gives you two options: if you want privacy, use a z-address (which truly protects privacy); if you find it troublesome, use a t-address, which is completely transparent and open to any on-chain analysis tools.



This is what's called "optional privacy." Compared to Monero, which defaults to full encryption all the way, Zcash’s approach is obviously more appealing to regulators. You can see how ZEC is still available for trading on major platforms, and that shows how effective this strategy really is. To put it bluntly, the choice of technical path is, to some extent, a game with regulators—either go all-in like Monero, or leave a backdoor for compliance.
ZEC-8.32%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Blockchainiacvip
· 21h ago
Ha, this whole "optional privacy" approach by Zcash is really clever—just a way to survive longer, huh? --- Monero goes head-to-head with regulators, while Zcash keeps its head down. Looks like even the crypto world has to learn to compromise. --- z-addresses are truly private, t-addresses are completely transparent—doesn't this just leave a backdoor for regulators to check? --- No wonder ZEC can survive on mainstream exchanges; they never intended to go "all out" from the start. --- Security teams like SlowMist always have to explain this; those who get it already do, those who don't should wake up. --- To put it simply, it's technical compromise in exchange for compliance—that's the real survival rule in crypto. --- "Optional privacy" sounds fancy, but it's really just another way to say "regulator-friendly." --- If you want privacy, use a z-address; if you want convenience, you expose yourself. I have to admit, Zcash's logic makes sense.
View OriginalReply0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯vip
· 21h ago
Ha, it's the same old "optional privacy" talk again. Basically, they're just trying to have it both ways. Monero is the real deal, Zcash is just flirting with the regulators this time. How much free time do people have to use z-addresses anyway? Most of them still use t-addresses as usual.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetectivevip
· 21h ago
Ha, bringing up Zcash privacy again? Honestly, it’s all about playing both sides in the middle. --- z-addresses are truly private, t-addresses are fully transparent—this approach is definitely smarter than Monero. --- Leaving a compliance backdoor sounds like a compromise, but you have to survive to keep playing. --- That’s why ZEC can get listed on mainstream exchanges now, while Monero can only hide in the corners—that’s just how it is. --- Optional privacy sounds advanced, but it’s really just giving regulators an easy way out. --- Cosine’s explanation this time is still clear—much better than some coins’ ambiguity. --- Why does it feel like all privacy coins are playing mind games with regulators now? --- Honestly, if you really need privacy, z-addresses are reliable, but how many people actually use them? --- Choosing a technical route = political wisdom—that’s truly the state of crypto in 2024.
View OriginalReply0
SelfSovereignStevevip
· 21h ago
Regulatory compromise in exchange for listing, that's why ZEC is doing better than Monero.
View OriginalReply0
SerNgmivip
· 21h ago
ZEC's "optional privacy" approach is really the master of compromise. It wants privacy but also doesn't want to get kicked out by exchanges. On the other hand, XMR is really hardcore—there's absolutely no room for negotiation. This move might seem smart, but actually... how should I put it, it's giving regulators too much room to maneuver. Most people use t-addresses, which ends up being completely transparent, making the privacy feature feel almost meaningless. Everyone's betting on regulatory tolerance, but it's hard to say how long ZEC can keep playing this hand.
View OriginalReply0
BTCBeliefStationvip
· 21h ago
Monero truly understands privacy, while Zcash's optional privacy is basically just leaving a way out for regulators. It's just playing Tai Chi with the rules—smart, but not tough enough.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)