Trump's latest move? Trying to keep advanced AI chips flowing to China while maintaining control. The White House believes controlled access might prevent Beijing from going full throttle on domestic alternatives.
But here's the kicker – this balancing act could backfire spectacularly. When you dangle cutting-edge semiconductor tech in front of a nation that's already pouring billions into self-reliance, you're basically setting a timer on your own leverage.
The crypto and AI sectors should be watching this closely. These chips power everything from mining operations to machine learning models that drive trading algorithms. If supply chains fracture faster than expected, we might see some wild pivots in how computational resources get allocated across the industry.
Some analysts think the strategy buys time. Others argue it just delays the inevitable decoupling. Either way, the tech world's about to find out if you can have your geopolitical cake and eat it too.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LayerZeroHero
· 21h ago
The actual measured data is right here. Once the chip supply chain breaks, the computational cost of cross-chain ecosystems skyrockets. This isn't as simple as it seems.
View OriginalReply0
MetamaskMechanic
· 21h ago
nah this logic is backwards tbh... dangling chips to prevent self-reliance? that's just handing them the blueprints lol
Reply0
SilentObserver
· 12-09 23:31
ngl this move is too naive. China has been developing its own technology for a long time. Do you really think giving them a few chips can stop them? This is a typical case of drinking poison to quench thirst.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 12-09 23:30
NGL, this game is pretty tense. They're trying to choke us on chips again, but China has been pushing for self-reliance for a long time... Guess it's just mutual damage at this point.
View OriginalReply0
PumpStrategist
· 12-09 23:28
Looking at this logic, it's a typical zero-sum game mentality. Trading chips for time? The chips are highly concentrated in the hands of the US, but the other side has already invested hundreds of billions in independent R&D. Isn't this just a slow-motion giveaway?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 12-09 23:16
The game of controlling chips always ends up losing to time in the end.
View OriginalReply0
BanklessAtHeart
· 12-09 23:15
This is playing with fire—using chips as bargaining chips has ended up backfiring.
View OriginalReply0
CantAffordPancake
· 12-09 23:11
NGL, this move is pretty risky... Trying to win people over with a small sweetener, but they're busy going all-in on domestic alternatives themselves. Isn't this playing with fire?
Trump's latest move? Trying to keep advanced AI chips flowing to China while maintaining control. The White House believes controlled access might prevent Beijing from going full throttle on domestic alternatives.
But here's the kicker – this balancing act could backfire spectacularly. When you dangle cutting-edge semiconductor tech in front of a nation that's already pouring billions into self-reliance, you're basically setting a timer on your own leverage.
The crypto and AI sectors should be watching this closely. These chips power everything from mining operations to machine learning models that drive trading algorithms. If supply chains fracture faster than expected, we might see some wild pivots in how computational resources get allocated across the industry.
Some analysts think the strategy buys time. Others argue it just delays the inevitable decoupling. Either way, the tech world's about to find out if you can have your geopolitical cake and eat it too.