Jensen Huang is at it again! This time, he’s directly defining Bitcoin as an “energy transporter.” It sounds mysterious at first, but if you think about it, there’s actually something to it.
The NVIDIA CEO recently put forward this idea: In remote corners of the world, hydropower stations and wind farms generate electricity that simply can’t be transmitted anywhere. It either gets wasted or abandoned altogether. But once miners are running, this “stranded power” instantly finds a purpose—it gets converted into Bitcoin, turning into a digital asset you can carry on your phone.
Put simply, it’s about transforming geographically constrained energy into a borderless store of value. Even if the power grid goes down, Bitcoin can still circulate. That’s pretty wild.
People used to complain about how much electricity mining consumes, but with this new perspective, you could say it’s actually “recycling” electricity that would otherwise be wasted. The hydropower that used to rot away in the mountains can now become a globally traded crypto asset, and it might even become a future balancing tool for the grid. Think about it: oil fields dry up, power lines break, but once Bitcoin is generated, it can cross half the planet in seconds.
This way of monetizing energy—could it be the next tech trend? With the AI chip giant suddenly backing this idea, the business logic behind it is worth pondering.
Energy democratization might sound far off, but miners are already making it happen. Do you think this path is viable?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SerumSquirter
· 21h ago
Jensen Huang's statement is pretty smart, but it also feels like he's trying to whitewash mining, doesn't it? The unused electricity could have been used in other ways, but only converting it into BTC counts as "recycling"?
View OriginalReply0
CafeMinor
· 21h ago
Huang’s remarks definitely have that vibe, but mining with excess electricity has been going on for a while—it’s nothing new.
“Energy transporter” sounds impressive, but at the end of the day, it’s just about consuming surplus capacity. The real issue is that the electricity in these remote valleys was supposed to be used for poverty alleviation, but now it’s all eaten up by mining farms.
That being said, Bitcoin being able to cross half the globe instantly is truly remarkable—wire transfers and such don’t even come close in terms of speed.
Wait, is Huang now starting to endorse mining? Does this mean Nvidia also wants a piece of the mining chip pie?
Legalizing mining with surplus electricity is only a matter of time—the key is electricity costs. Once cheap power in remote areas becomes accessible, this business will explode.
“Energy democratization” sounds sexy, but will local governments allow it? That’s the real question.
View OriginalReply0
FlippedSignal
· 21h ago
Huang’s rhetoric is indeed clever, dressing up mining with an “eco-friendly” facade.
But is there really that much excess electricity? Feels like a false demand...
“Energy transporter”? Sounds like marketing jargon. Are there really that many buyers?
The logic holds up on paper, but in reality, mining farms still flock to places with cheap electricity.
At the end of the day, it’s just about legitimizing Bitcoin. Quite adept at it.
View OriginalReply0
StakeTillRetire
· 21h ago
Huang's rhetoric is a bit outrageous—does mining with surplus electricity really solve the energy problem? Sounds more like he's trying to whitewash the mining industry.
Jensen Huang is at it again! This time, he’s directly defining Bitcoin as an “energy transporter.” It sounds mysterious at first, but if you think about it, there’s actually something to it.
The NVIDIA CEO recently put forward this idea: In remote corners of the world, hydropower stations and wind farms generate electricity that simply can’t be transmitted anywhere. It either gets wasted or abandoned altogether. But once miners are running, this “stranded power” instantly finds a purpose—it gets converted into Bitcoin, turning into a digital asset you can carry on your phone.
Put simply, it’s about transforming geographically constrained energy into a borderless store of value. Even if the power grid goes down, Bitcoin can still circulate. That’s pretty wild.
People used to complain about how much electricity mining consumes, but with this new perspective, you could say it’s actually “recycling” electricity that would otherwise be wasted. The hydropower that used to rot away in the mountains can now become a globally traded crypto asset, and it might even become a future balancing tool for the grid. Think about it: oil fields dry up, power lines break, but once Bitcoin is generated, it can cross half the planet in seconds.
This way of monetizing energy—could it be the next tech trend? With the AI chip giant suddenly backing this idea, the business logic behind it is worth pondering.
Energy democratization might sound far off, but miners are already making it happen. Do you think this path is viable?