Something strange has happened in the last three years: while the S&P 500 soared by 82%, the Fed's balance sheet shrank by 27%. This is a scenario that defies market logic.
This week, everyone is talking about a rate cut. It is predicted with an 86% probability that rates will be cut by 25 basis points. But the real question is: as economic pressures mount and signals of leadership changes emerge at the Fed, can the policy path really be predicted?
Interestingly, the fact that stocks have risen so much during a period of monetary tightening turns classical liquidity theories upside down. The situation of "less money but higher prices" makes us question long-accepted market rules. Perhaps the relationship between liquidity and asset prices is not as simple as we thought.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTragedy
· 5h ago
Why does it feel like everything is going against expectations this time? The Fed is shrinking its balance sheet, yet the stock market is still soaring. Truly incredible.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleTreeHugger
· 14h ago
Less money, stocks actually rise? That logic is really absurd, it feels like the entire market is just acting.
View OriginalReply0
ShibaSunglasses
· 12-09 17:56
This logic reversal is truly unbelievable—less money, yet stocks are rising. What happened to the liquidity theory?
View OriginalReply0
tokenomics_truther
· 12-09 17:56
No matter how I look at it, this logic doesn’t make sense... Less money but the stock price soars—could something be wrong here?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedThrice
· 12-09 17:51
This is really unbelievable. The Fed is shrinking its balance sheet but the stock market is soaring—this logic just doesn’t make sense at all.
Shouldn’t these rules be changed? Everyone’s just watching rate cut expectations, but economic pressures are piling up. Who can really say what’s going to happen next?
Even with parasal daralma, stocks are still going up—traditional theory is completely breaking down. I just want to know when this bubble will finally burst.
Let’s see if rate cuts can stabilize things. Honestly, it feels a bit too optimistic.
Money is shrinking but stock prices are rising… What kind of era is this? Maybe it’s time to rethink the entire financial framework.
Rate cuts are just a surface-level move. The key is, what does the Fed really want to do? The signals are way too confusing.
Asset bubbles vs economic pressure—which one will win? My bet is the former will burst first.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSweaterFan
· 12-09 17:48
This data is a bit strange... Money is disappearing but stock prices are soaring. What happened to economics?
Can the Fed really predict this round? It feels like there are too many variables.
Something strange has happened in the last three years: while the S&P 500 soared by 82%, the Fed's balance sheet shrank by 27%. This is a scenario that defies market logic.
This week, everyone is talking about a rate cut. It is predicted with an 86% probability that rates will be cut by 25 basis points. But the real question is: as economic pressures mount and signals of leadership changes emerge at the Fed, can the policy path really be predicted?
Interestingly, the fact that stocks have risen so much during a period of monetary tightening turns classical liquidity theories upside down. The situation of "less money but higher prices" makes us question long-accepted market rules. Perhaps the relationship between liquidity and asset prices is not as simple as we thought.