Recently, there have been reports that the US government is quietly making a major move—investing over $1 billion to acquire stakes in several mining companies.
This time, the target isn't just any ordinary minerals, but "chokepoint" resources like gallium and cobalt. The iPhone in your hand, high-performance magnets in industrial equipment, and even military systems and new energy technologies all rely on these materials. The problem is that the supply chains for these minerals have long been tightly controlled by certain countries.
MP Materials Corp, Vulcan Elements, and Trilogy Metals have become key targets for support. Simply put, this is about using real money to reconstruct the security net of the supply chain.
What does this mean for the crypto market? The escalation of the resource war may increase risk-averse sentiment and also impact the cost of mining hardware. The battle for mineral resources reflects a deeper logic of geopolitical rivalry.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
JustHereForMemes
· 12-10 20:02
Another geopolitical drama unfolds, and the US really is willing to spend money
This time, the mineral race heats up, and mining costs are set to skyrocket
Gallium and cobalt are bottlenecks, and hardware costs for BTC must rise
It's only 1 billion dollars, I thought it was some major move
In supply chain matters, whoever controls the resources holds the power, an eternal game
As risk aversion sentiment rises, it's time to see how the crypto market responds
The mineral positioning war, to put it simply, is a muscle show between major powers
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 12-09 17:00
Here comes the geopolitical stuff again. Is mining cost about to skyrocket?
---
1 billion USD invested in minerals, is this paving the way for BTC mining? Haha
---
With gallium and cobalt being restricted, mining machine chips are about to get more expensive.
---
Supply chain security = stable coin prices? I believe it.
---
Will coins become a safe haven as the resource war heats up? Feels like it might drain liquidity instead.
---
Are these companies' stocks worth buying, more stable than hoarding coins?
---
A reflection of geopolitical games? Ultimately, it’s still about fighting for the right to speak.
---
Rising hardware costs are directly choking miners. This move is making it harder for ordinary people to mine.
View OriginalReply0
fomo_fighter
· 12-09 16:54
Another wave of geopolitical exploitation is here, with the mineral wars heating up—BTC is going to rise.
View OriginalReply0
OfflineNewbie
· 12-09 16:48
Supply chain bottlenecks mean mining costs are going to rise again.
View OriginalReply0
PriceOracleFairy
· 12-09 16:43
wait so they're basically frontrunning the entire supply chain like it's some kinda MEV play... 1B+ is honestly just noise until we see the actual price deviation metrics on rare earth futures tho
Recently, there have been reports that the US government is quietly making a major move—investing over $1 billion to acquire stakes in several mining companies.
This time, the target isn't just any ordinary minerals, but "chokepoint" resources like gallium and cobalt. The iPhone in your hand, high-performance magnets in industrial equipment, and even military systems and new energy technologies all rely on these materials. The problem is that the supply chains for these minerals have long been tightly controlled by certain countries.
MP Materials Corp, Vulcan Elements, and Trilogy Metals have become key targets for support. Simply put, this is about using real money to reconstruct the security net of the supply chain.
What does this mean for the crypto market? The escalation of the resource war may increase risk-averse sentiment and also impact the cost of mining hardware. The battle for mineral resources reflects a deeper logic of geopolitical rivalry.