I see some people are still puzzled about why government bond yields are soaring while the subscription multiplier is also surging—put simply, it’s because they don’t really understand how auctions work.
Let’s look at it from another angle. Imagine you’re at an auction house looking at a vase. The starting bid is 500,000; someone calls out 510,000, you go with 520,000—that’s how the secondary market works: open bidding, and whoever bids higher gets it.
But government bond auctions don’t work like that. They’re sealed bids—each institution writes a number and puts it in a box, unable to see what others are bidding. Suppose the market estimates the vase is worth 510,000, but when the bids are opened: some bid 500,000, others 490,000, and someone even goes straight to 480,000…
Logically, you’d think you should just go for 510,000 and take it, right? Here’s the problem—why buy the vase? To flip it for a profit. If I buy it at 510,000 and sell it again at 510,000, after deducting fees, I’ll end up losing money—only a fool would do that.
So, on the surface, there are tons of institutions participating, but in reality, everyone is doing their own calculations: “I’m not in a rush, I’ll just wait for a bargain.” In this case, what’s being auctioned isn’t really the market price—it’s about who can hold their nerve the longest.
Then why are so many people joining the crowd? Take Japanese government bonds for example—the prices keep dropping, yields keep climbing, and institutions see: “Hey, isn’t this a chance for free money?” Everyone thinks, “What if I get lucky?” Anyway, there’s no loss in bidding low. With more participants, the subscription multiplier naturally goes up.
In the end, the market isn’t going crazy—it’s a game of human psychology.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
IfIWereOnChain
· 12-12 14:22
The core is who can remain patient; this game of strategy is thoroughly understood at its essence.
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHustler
· 12-11 10:50
Basically, it's all a game played by institutions—whoever blinks first loses.
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreets
· 12-11 05:41
Basically, it's a prisoner’s dilemma—everyone wants to take a chance, but as a result, everyone ends up trapped together.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleMaid
· 12-09 15:02
The vase metaphor is spot on—it's like a bunch of people secretly testing who can hold out longer... it's a real psychological battle.
View OriginalReply0
PumpDoctrine
· 12-09 15:01
Ha, finally someone has explained this thoroughly. I was wondering why so many institutions were just playing dead.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictim
· 12-09 14:52
Ah, well... it's pretty clear, everyone's just betting on who will blink first.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirter
· 12-09 14:37
Damn, this logic is brilliant. I totally understood the vase part—turns out everyone was just waiting to pick up a bargain.
I see some people are still puzzled about why government bond yields are soaring while the subscription multiplier is also surging—put simply, it’s because they don’t really understand how auctions work.
Let’s look at it from another angle. Imagine you’re at an auction house looking at a vase. The starting bid is 500,000; someone calls out 510,000, you go with 520,000—that’s how the secondary market works: open bidding, and whoever bids higher gets it.
But government bond auctions don’t work like that. They’re sealed bids—each institution writes a number and puts it in a box, unable to see what others are bidding. Suppose the market estimates the vase is worth 510,000, but when the bids are opened: some bid 500,000, others 490,000, and someone even goes straight to 480,000…
Logically, you’d think you should just go for 510,000 and take it, right? Here’s the problem—why buy the vase? To flip it for a profit. If I buy it at 510,000 and sell it again at 510,000, after deducting fees, I’ll end up losing money—only a fool would do that.
So, on the surface, there are tons of institutions participating, but in reality, everyone is doing their own calculations: “I’m not in a rush, I’ll just wait for a bargain.” In this case, what’s being auctioned isn’t really the market price—it’s about who can hold their nerve the longest.
Then why are so many people joining the crowd? Take Japanese government bonds for example—the prices keep dropping, yields keep climbing, and institutions see: “Hey, isn’t this a chance for free money?” Everyone thinks, “What if I get lucky?” Anyway, there’s no loss in bidding low. With more participants, the subscription multiplier naturally goes up.
In the end, the market isn’t going crazy—it’s a game of human psychology.