Arkham (the platform specializing in on-chain data tracking) suddenly announced that they can now track ZEC transfers. With this news out, a lot of people are probably panicking.
Why did ZEC shoot up to $750 back in the day? The core reason boils down to two words—privacy. When Chen Zhi's 120,000 BTC stash was cracked and traced, everyone started worrying about Bitcoin's transaction privacy. ZEC took advantage of this hype and skyrocketed. Although the market later corrected it back to the $300-400 range, the privacy narrative was firmly established.
But now? Arkham just came in and tore apart ZEC’s privacy.
Some old players in the space have questioned before: when certain people were hyping up ZEC, were they really buying in, or just taking incentives from the project team? After all, ZEC claimed not to record counterparties, didn’t show addresses, and didn’t reveal amounts—no one could verify anything. Now that the privacy veil has been lifted, ZEC’s core selling point has taken a huge hit.
The privacy sector has actually been in an awkward spot these past few years. XMR, due to its "absolute privacy," has been targeted by Western regulators and delisted from major exchanges; now ZEC has been proven traceable. On the other hand, DASH—which was previously lukewarm—suddenly looks appealing.
DASH has privacy features, but they’re not as extreme as XMR, so there’s less regulatory pressure. More importantly, it has built a payment ecosystem. At the summit in Dubai not long ago, CZ clearly stated that the future value of cryptocurrencies lies in payment scenarios. Looking at it this way, DASH has both privacy and is betting on payments, so it has both advantages.
People used to think DASH was a fence-sitter, but now it seems they’re actually the true pragmatists. With the market direction shifting, who would’ve thought DASH would be the one laughing in the end?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HashRateHermit
· 12-12 09:23
Damn, now ZEC has really been exposed completely. Privacy coins are just a joke.
View OriginalReply0
LidoStakeAddict
· 12-11 10:16
Damn, ZEC is now completely socially dead. Once the privacy cover is removed, there's nothing left.
View OriginalReply0
LiquiditySurfer
· 12-09 09:51
Damn, has ZEC's privacy been compromised? Are those guys who were hyping it before feeling awkward now?
View OriginalReply0
GweiObserver
· 12-09 09:48
Ha, now ZEC's fig leaf has really been torn off. No wonder so many people hyped it up before.
The path for privacy coins is getting narrower and narrower. XMR is banned, and DASH has unexpectedly become the dark horse. Sometimes, you just have to admit the market can be this ironic.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter9000
· 12-09 09:25
Damn, ZEC got completely broken through—privacy coins really just lost their last fig leaf.
From 750 to now, this drop is truly painful. Those who were calling buys before must be pretty embarrassed now.
DASH, on the other hand, picked up a bargain this round—dodged regulation and still gets to play in payments. That's impressive.
Honestly, the real money makers are never those chasing the latest hype—they’re the ones who bet on the right track.
Arkham’s move just ended ZEC’s narrative. The privacy coin path is getting harder and harder.
The payment ecosystem is the real deal—CZ nailed it with that quote.
No one really believed in DASH before, but now it looks like they were the dark horse all along.
The privacy sector has been chaotic these past years—XMR got delisted, ZEC got tracked, and the ones that survived are the less extreme ones.
People still holding ZEC are probably either trying to catch the bottom or cutting their losses by now.
That’s market rotation for you—this year’s trash coin might be hot next year. Either way, I’m done with ZEC.
Now things are getting interesting.
Arkham (the platform specializing in on-chain data tracking) suddenly announced that they can now track ZEC transfers. With this news out, a lot of people are probably panicking.
Why did ZEC shoot up to $750 back in the day? The core reason boils down to two words—privacy. When Chen Zhi's 120,000 BTC stash was cracked and traced, everyone started worrying about Bitcoin's transaction privacy. ZEC took advantage of this hype and skyrocketed. Although the market later corrected it back to the $300-400 range, the privacy narrative was firmly established.
But now? Arkham just came in and tore apart ZEC’s privacy.
Some old players in the space have questioned before: when certain people were hyping up ZEC, were they really buying in, or just taking incentives from the project team? After all, ZEC claimed not to record counterparties, didn’t show addresses, and didn’t reveal amounts—no one could verify anything. Now that the privacy veil has been lifted, ZEC’s core selling point has taken a huge hit.
The privacy sector has actually been in an awkward spot these past few years. XMR, due to its "absolute privacy," has been targeted by Western regulators and delisted from major exchanges; now ZEC has been proven traceable. On the other hand, DASH—which was previously lukewarm—suddenly looks appealing.
DASH has privacy features, but they’re not as extreme as XMR, so there’s less regulatory pressure. More importantly, it has built a payment ecosystem. At the summit in Dubai not long ago, CZ clearly stated that the future value of cryptocurrencies lies in payment scenarios. Looking at it this way, DASH has both privacy and is betting on payments, so it has both advantages.
People used to think DASH was a fence-sitter, but now it seems they’re actually the true pragmatists. With the market direction shifting, who would’ve thought DASH would be the one laughing in the end?