When it comes to Bitcoin, everyone knows it’s the king of cryptocurrencies. But to be honest, isn’t this big brother a bit too “zen”? Like a statue, unmoved and unshakeable.

Take a look at the BTC out there—what are most of them doing most of the time? Either locked away in hardware wallets or lying quietly in exchange accounts—maximum security, but basically a digital treasure vault. Here’s the problem: this kind of “static state” completely isolates Bitcoin from all the wild, yield-generating action happening on-chain.

Other assets are thriving in DeFi protocols, with yields soaring, while Bitcoin is still sticking to its old “store of value” role. How can that not make people anxious?

At this critical moment, the Lorenzo protocol makes its entrance. Its ambition is straightforward: get Bitcoin moving, get it involved, and let it earn money too.

**1. The Core Dilemma: Why Don’t BTC Holders Dare to Experiment?**

It’s not that Bitcoin holders don’t want yields—the costs and risks are just too high to take the leap.

Want to move coins to another chain to participate in DeFi? That means using a cross-chain bridge. But haven’t we seen enough news about cross-chain bridge exploits in recent years? Hundreds of millions lost overnight—who dares to try it lightly?

What about using wrapped Bitcoin (like wBTC)? That means trusting a centralized institution. But isn’t “not your keys, not your coins” the core belief of Bitcoiners? Handing over control flies in the face of Bitcoin’s decentralized ethos.

Simply put, BTC holders have three bottom lines: security comes first, decentralization is non-negotiable, and they must retain control. Sacrificing all that for a little interest? That’s a bad trade-off.

**2. Lorenzo’s Approach: Keep Your Keys, Still Start the Engine**

Lorenzo’s cleverness lies in the fact that it has found a subtle balance—