Over the past week, the US has seen net inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs, including IBIT (BlackRock), FBTC (Fidelity), BITB (Bitwise), ARKB (ARK 21Shares), HODL (VanEck), and BTCW (WisdomTree). During this period, several days recorded positive capital inflows ([flow summary] 1. On December 2, IBIT attracted approximately **$120.1 million**, while FBTC and BITB received smaller additions 2. On December 6, ARKB, HODL, BTCW, FBTC, and BITB all saw net inflows, despite outflows from IBIT ([issuer flows] 3. For the week, Bitcoin ETFs received **$352 million** in net inflows, according to CoinShares Leaders on December 2 Inflows were recorded for the fifth consecutive day, with IBIT receiving significant investments, and FBTC and BITB smaller ones. The totals were: IBIT — **$120.1 million**, FBTC — **$21.8 million**, BITB — **$7.4 million**. At the same time, ARKB recorded a large outflow . This shows that inflow leadership can change from day to day. **What this means:** IBIT often tops inflow charts, but sustained demand is spread across different funds and may be unstable. Mixed trends at the end of the week Despite outflows from IBIT, several other issuers recorded positive inflows: ARKB — **$42.8 million**, FBTC — **$27.3 million**, HODL — **$11.4 million**, BITB — **$4.9 million**, BTCW — **$0.9 million**. As a result, the session ended with a positive net result. What this means: Even if the largest fund shows outflows, a broad range of other ETFs can support an overall positive balance. Weekly context Over the past week, Bitcoin-focused products received **$352 million** in net inflows, which is about half of all crypto fund inflows, according to CoinShares . Meanwhile, short Bitcoin ETPs saw outflows of **$18.7 million**, which may indicate that some investors believe the recent price decline has bottomed out **What this means:** Overall inflows turned positive compared to the previous week, but the dynamics and distribution among issuers change daily. Tracking data for each issuer helps to better understand real trends. BOTTOM LINE Recent inflows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs have been driven by the IBIT, FBTC, BITB, ARKB, HODL, and BTCW funds, with leadership shifting from session to session. Overall, the weekly balance is positive, but daily capital flows remain volatile and depend on specific issuers. For those wanting to monitor demand dynamics, it is helpful to analyze both overall inflows and issuer distribution to assess the sustainability of investor interest.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Sleeve
0
· 3h ago
1000x Vibes 🤑
Reply0
Sleeve
0
· 3h ago
1000x Vibes 🤑
Reply0
Discovery
0
· 12-09 10:19
Watching Closely 🔍
Reply0
CryptoSelf
0
· 12-09 10:08
HODL Tight 💪
Reply0
Fengyue
0
· 12-09 05:06
.E.C overseas institutions have just taken over. Starting tomorrow at 17:00, there will be 10 consecutive days of trending searches.
Ave observation list: addresses 567 with millions of USD have been recorded. The overseas foundation's 60 million is under audit. The brand-new mechanism has been upgraded. Let's work hard for 100 days to create ten-thousand-fold brilliance together.
.E.C overseas institutions have just taken over. Starting tomorrow at 17:00, there will be 10 consecutive days of trending searches.
Ave observation list: addresses 567 with millions of USD have been recorded. The overseas foundation's 60 million is under audit. The brand-new mechanism has been upgraded. Let's work hard for 100 days to create ten-thousand-fold brilliance together.
#BitcoinActivityPicksUp
Over the past week, the US has seen net inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs, including IBIT (BlackRock), FBTC (Fidelity), BITB (Bitwise), ARKB (ARK 21Shares), HODL (VanEck), and BTCW (WisdomTree). During this period, several days recorded positive capital inflows ([flow summary] 1. On December 2, IBIT attracted approximately **$120.1 million**, while FBTC and BITB received smaller additions 2. On December 6, ARKB, HODL, BTCW, FBTC, and BITB all saw net inflows, despite outflows from IBIT ([issuer flows] 3. For the week, Bitcoin ETFs received **$352 million** in net inflows, according to CoinShares Leaders on December 2 Inflows were recorded for the fifth consecutive day, with IBIT receiving significant investments, and FBTC and BITB smaller ones. The totals were: IBIT — **$120.1 million**, FBTC — **$21.8 million**, BITB — **$7.4 million**. At the same time, ARKB recorded a large outflow . This shows that inflow leadership can change from day to day. **What this means:** IBIT often tops inflow charts, but sustained demand is spread across different funds and may be unstable. Mixed trends at the end of the week Despite outflows from IBIT, several other issuers recorded positive inflows: ARKB — **$42.8 million**, FBTC — **$27.3 million**, HODL — **$11.4 million**, BITB — **$4.9 million**, BTCW — **$0.9 million**. As a result, the session ended with a positive net result. What this means: Even if the largest fund shows outflows, a broad range of other ETFs can support an overall positive balance. Weekly context Over the past week, Bitcoin-focused products received **$352 million** in net inflows, which is about half of all crypto fund inflows, according to CoinShares . Meanwhile, short Bitcoin ETPs saw outflows of **$18.7 million**, which may indicate that some investors believe the recent price decline has bottomed out **What this means:** Overall inflows turned positive compared to the previous week, but the dynamics and distribution among issuers change daily. Tracking data for each issuer helps to better understand real trends. BOTTOM LINE Recent inflows into US spot Bitcoin ETFs have been driven by the IBIT, FBTC, BITB, ARKB, HODL, and BTCW funds, with leadership shifting from session to session. Overall, the weekly balance is positive, but daily capital flows remain volatile and depend on specific issuers. For those wanting to monitor demand dynamics, it is helpful to analyze both overall inflows and issuer distribution to assess the sustainability of investor interest.