Let me tell you a true story about how I grew my account from 1,700 USDT to 130,000 USDT.
I used to be like most people, spending my days studying all kinds of technical indicators, constantly drawing lines on candlestick charts, thinking I was really professional. But after three consecutive heavy losses, I started doubting myself. Eventually, I stopped overcomplicating things and followed three basic principles.
First, only trade breakouts. I ignore all those consolidation ranges and shakeouts. I wait until the price breaks a key level before entering. If it's a real breakout, I follow it; if it's a fakeout, I accept the loss and get out. It might sound silly, but it's actually much clearer to execute.
Second, control your position size. I never use more than 20% of my funds per trade. If I make a profit, I take it; if I lose, I stop. This way, a single mistake won't seriously hurt me, and I won't give back my profits out of greed. Some people make over a dozen trades a day; I might only make one or two trades a week, but my account grows more steadily.
Third, follow the trend. I don't try to pick tops or bottoms. I go long when the market is rising and short when it's falling. There's no complicated analysis—just making sure I'm on the right side of the direction. Some people think this approach is too simple or not sophisticated enough, but the numbers in my account are more convincing than anything else.
I'm not some trading genius. I just repeat simple things and stick to basic principles. All those complex theories and advanced techniques often end up confusing people. If you're stuck in losses, maybe try this simple approach. Stick to it for a month and you might discover something different.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DegenDreamer
· 2h ago
Basically, it's just not being greedy, and I agree with that.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainMessenger
· 5h ago
You're right, I was really overwhelmed by those complicated indicators. Learning your method feels much more comfortable.
How should I put it, simple and straightforward methods often work best. I used to think I could calculate the top and bottom myself, but every time I got it wrong.
The 20% position trick is brilliant, it saved me a lot of unnecessary losses.
Breakouts, then act; false breakouts, then run. It sounds easy, but executing it still requires discipline.
This approach is much more reliable than my previous method of trading a dozen times a day, really.
Account growth is slow but steady—that's what we should be aiming for.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurker
· 12-09 14:06
It does sound like being simple and straightforward actually makes money.
---
What I fear most are these kinds of stories—told in extreme detail, but never any screenshots.
---
He’s right about position management; most people lose because of greed.
---
Only trading breakouts and following trends—sounds textbook, but what about actually executing it?
---
130,000 is definitely not a small amount, but I read a dozen articles like this every month, and every one claims to be a true story.
---
I totally relate to controlling positions. I used to want to go all-in every time, but now cutting 20% at a time feels much better.
---
The part about not overtrading really hit home. I only figured it out after losing three times in a row.
---
Sounds easy, but how many can actually stick with it for a month and survive?
---
The logic is fine; it’s just that the difficulty of execution is underestimated.
---
Adding 20% position on breakouts sounds like a preset combo meal.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeDodger
· 12-09 03:50
Sounds like survivorship bias, but keeping a 20% position is indeed a solid move.
By the way, did you really stick to your discipline for a whole year without breaking it? That’s the real challenge.
Simple strategies sound easy but are hard to execute—most people can’t last three months.
I’ve tried breakout trading too, but those fake breakouts made me quit.
But going from 1,700 to 130,000, that’s an insane multiple. Risk control really is the top priority.
Watching candlesticks every day still led me to lose money, but using a simple and straightforward approach actually made me profit.
This mindset is totally opposite of what many people hype as “advanced techniques”—pretty interesting.
Position management is way more effective than technical indicators; I’ve learned my lesson too.
I agree with the idea of trend following and not trying to catch the bottom, but it’s easy to FOMO into the market.
Honestly, I just worry that if this method is written out, a bunch of people will still lose money after learning it, and then blame the method.
View OriginalReply0
MEVictim
· 12-09 03:50
Damn, isn’t this what we always say—great truths are simple? The simpler it is, the more money you make; the more complicated, the more you lose...
But seriously, a 20% position size is pretty bold. I need to reflect on myself.
Really? Just one or two trades a week can bring steady growth? Feels like it still depends on the market.
I've tried breakouts, but I'm always afraid of fake breakouts and losing my composure.
Feels like you're teaching us how to cut losses, while we're still dreaming of making a big comeback.
I've heard this story plenty of times—it always ends with "stick to it for a month," but how many people actually do?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c799715c
· 12-09 03:43
That's right, it's all about execution. Most people fail because of overtrading.
Honestly, the difference between making money and losing money comes down to just a tiny detail.
I've remembered the 20% position size—I'll give it a try later.
I've seen plenty of people making a dozen trades a day, and we all know how they end up.
This logic applies to any market, not just crypto.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysQuestioning
· 12-09 03:39
This theory sounds plausible, but it's hard to implement.
View OriginalReply0
ZenZKPlayer
· 12-09 03:36
Listen, what you said makes sense, but I trust the experience I’ve gained from my own losses more.
Seriously, 76x returns are definitely impressive, but I have to give you a thumbs up for that 20% position control—I've really learned that lesson myself.
The problem is sticking with it for a month? Bro, that's easier said than done. You can't just develop a strong mindset against losses in a month or two.
I've tried breakout strategies before. Has anyone else experienced the heartbreak of false breakouts again and again? I just can't take it.
But to be fair, making fewer moves does make money—I won't deny that logic.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressMiner
· 12-09 03:31
Earned 76x, but what I care more about is the original source address of this 1700U... Everyone says it's simple and effective, but have you ever wondered why so many people can't do it? On-chain footprints will tell the story.
Let me tell you a true story about how I grew my account from 1,700 USDT to 130,000 USDT.
I used to be like most people, spending my days studying all kinds of technical indicators, constantly drawing lines on candlestick charts, thinking I was really professional. But after three consecutive heavy losses, I started doubting myself. Eventually, I stopped overcomplicating things and followed three basic principles.
First, only trade breakouts. I ignore all those consolidation ranges and shakeouts. I wait until the price breaks a key level before entering. If it's a real breakout, I follow it; if it's a fakeout, I accept the loss and get out. It might sound silly, but it's actually much clearer to execute.
Second, control your position size. I never use more than 20% of my funds per trade. If I make a profit, I take it; if I lose, I stop. This way, a single mistake won't seriously hurt me, and I won't give back my profits out of greed. Some people make over a dozen trades a day; I might only make one or two trades a week, but my account grows more steadily.
Third, follow the trend. I don't try to pick tops or bottoms. I go long when the market is rising and short when it's falling. There's no complicated analysis—just making sure I'm on the right side of the direction. Some people think this approach is too simple or not sophisticated enough, but the numbers in my account are more convincing than anything else.
I'm not some trading genius. I just repeat simple things and stick to basic principles. All those complex theories and advanced techniques often end up confusing people. If you're stuck in losses, maybe try this simple approach. Stick to it for a month and you might discover something different.