This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-e19e9c10
· 3h ago
Onchain infrastructure has to rely on these old brands to support it, and ondo and the like must continue to be optimistic
View OriginalReply0
RektButSmiling
· 12-08 19:57
Alright, the conservative approach is indeed not wrong, but can ONDO really prove itself? I'm still taking a wait-and-see attitude...
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetective
· 12-08 19:55
Whale addresses have been accumulating ONDO recently. I've been tracking it on-chain for three days, and the transfer patterns are quite strange... We'll have to wait and see what happens next.
View OriginalReply0
FarmHopper
· 12-08 19:51
Right now, it mainly comes down to whose infrastructure is truly solid—reliability is key.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinArbitrageur
· 12-08 19:29
actually, the real edge here is noticing how most people conflate "proven" with "stagnant"... ONDO's infrastructure advantage compounds when you map out the basis points across different RWA corridors. been running the numbers on correlations between on-chain settlement times and slippage—results are honestly underwhelming compared to what everyone's hyping up tbh
$ONDO isn't going anywhere.
Tokenization? It's safest when done right. And right now, that means sticking with proven infrastructure.