2025-12-08 18:10:32

#数字货币市场洞察 If you ditch a reliable analyst just because of one or two losses, you'll end up regretting it. In trading, the key isn't focusing on the profit or loss of a single trade, but looking at the overall performance.

Yesterday's market recap: Bitcoin gained 8,278 points, Ethereum brought in 217 points.

Here's the trading record for Bitcoin: Long from 88,514 to 89,432, profit of 918 points; long from 89,568 to 90,979, profit of 1,411 points; short from 91,531 to 89,896, loss of 1,635 points; long from 89,883 to 91,386, profit of 1,503 points; long from 90,198 to 91,921, profit of 1,723 points; short from 92,031 to 90,894, stop loss of 1,137 points.

Ethereum's rhythm was also good: long from 2,952 to 3,031, +79 points; long from 3,084 to 3,168, +84 points; short from 3,159 to 3,105, -54 points.

See, even though there were some losing trades in between, the overall account is still profitable. That's why consistently following an experienced trader is more profitable—they know how to manage risk amid volatility and aren't swayed by the outcome of single trades.

$BTC $ETH $SOL

BTC-2.52%

ETH-3.5%

SOL-5.14%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OldLeekConfession

· 31m ago

Hi, this data indeed looks great, but those few stop-loss orders are a bit annoying, huh.

View OriginalReply0

PriceOracleFairy

· 8h ago

nah the real tell is whether they're managing drawdowns like pros or just chasing green candles... those loss trades? that's literally risk management in action, not failure lmao

Reply0

Layer2Observer

· 12-08 18:39

From the source code level, single-trade losses as data noise are actually quite normal; the key is whether the risk control model is solid enough. --- Interesting observation: as long as the overall win rate is positive, that's fine, but the question is whether the sample size is sufficient to support this conclusion. --- There's nothing wrong with this logic, but tracking who to follow is probably harder to solve than the tracking method itself. --- Theoretically, risk control is indeed important, but in practice, most people still get stuck on the emotions caused by single-trade losses. --- The data looks great, but one thing needs to be clarified—are these historical backtests or live accounts? There's a big difference between the two. --- The 1635-point stop-loss trade in the middle had no problem in terms of stop-loss logic, but it really takes strong mental fortitude. --- What still needs further verification is how this strategy performs under extreme market conditions; good-looking data doesn't necessarily mean it's stress-resistant. --- Not taking sides, but I’ve really seen too many people follow “genius” analysts only to lose it all back in a bear market.

View OriginalReply0

GasOptimizer

· 12-08 18:37

Let the data speak: Out of the 8,278-point profit, there were 4 winning trades and 2 losing trades... This kind of win rate is the real indicator, not just looking at individual wins and losses. Some people are too fragile—one -1,635-point loss and they start looking for scapegoats. Wake up, bro. If you control the drawdown, it means your risk management is in place.

View OriginalReply0

gas_guzzler

· 12-08 18:36

The data looks good, but those few losing trades—why were the stop-losses executed so decisively? If only I could be that ruthless, haha.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWizard

· 12-08 18:29

nah actually the risk-adjusted returns here are statistically significant... but let me be honest, that -1637 on btc? theoretically speaking that's just noise if your sharpe ratio holds up across the sample size, contrary to popular belief most people can't stomach the drawdown psychology

Reply0

ser_aped.eth

· 12-08 18:28

Even the bottom buyers are cutting their losses, but what really matters is the long-term returns. You can't just bail every time there's a loss.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#FedRateCutPrediction
47.67K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
47.01K Popularity
#CryptoMarketRebound
307.85K Popularity
#SUIETFLaunched
11.85K Popularity
#BitcoinActivityPicksUp
10.53K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
GPANDAGPANDA
MC:$3.71KHolders:2
0.50%
2
GlooGloo
MC:$3.56KHolders:1
0.00%
3
GLXGLX
MC:$3.56KHolders:1
0.00%
4
MGMerry Christmas Gate
MC:$4.02KHolders:3
1.96%
5
DOYRDOYR
MC:$3.61KHolders:1
0.00%

Sitemap