Remember the guy who called the 2008 housing crash? Michael Burry's now eyeing the AI sector with that same skeptical look. His take: we're watching another bubble inflate in real-time.
What's his reasoning? The fundamentals don't match the valuations. Sound familiar? When traditional markets sneeze, crypto markets catch pneumonia—especially AI tokens that've been riding this hype wave.
Worth watching how this plays out. If he's right again, could shake up everything from $RENDER to the latest AI agent coins. The question isn't if corrections happen, but when.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ParallelChainMaxi
· 1h ago
Burry is sounding the alarm again. This guy made one correct prediction and has been living off it ever since.
If this wave of AI concept tokens really crashes, those with high leverage will be crying their eyes out.
But seriously, what he said about fundamentals not matching valuations... That line fits crypto perfectly too.
Wait, how bad could AI tokens really crash? Could projects like RENDER really get cut in half?
Just worried it's another "boy who cried wolf" situation. I don't believe him for the third time.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePudding
· 2h ago
Burry is bearish again... Is this guy going to live off that one correct prediction for his whole life? lol
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 12-03 18:21
Burry really is a doomsayer... He got it right last time and has kept making predictions ever since. AI coins are indeed a bit crazy right now, but who can guarantee he's right this time too? I'll just hold onto $RENDER for now.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyLemur
· 12-03 18:18
Burry is making predictions again. Every time he speaks, the whole market gets shaken up. This time he's targeting AI. To be honest, it's a bit unsettling.
View OriginalReply0
TokenToaster
· 12-03 18:17
Burry is calling for a crash again... This guy makes a living by predicting crises, but I have to say, AI valuations are indeed outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
HappyMinerUncle
· 12-03 18:17
Burry is acting up again. Just because he got it right last time, does he think he's invincible now? Anyone can see the AI bubble, right?
NGL, this round of AI tokens skyrocketing is pretty absurd—the fundamentals don’t match those sky-high prices at all.
If he’s right again, tokens like Render might get cut in half. Better set your stop-loss orders, everyone.
But seriously, just because a financial genius got one prediction right, does that mean they're always right? I’d actually like to see if he can replicate the magic of 2008 this time.
I kind of agree with his logic, and although I hate to admit it, this really does feel like the eve of a mania.
View OriginalReply0
RugDocDetective
· 12-03 18:12
Burry is making predictions again... This guy is never accurate, but AI keeps surging even harder.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetective
· 12-03 18:03
It's not a bubble at all. According to on-chain data, the buying patterns of those whale wallets have long been locked in. Burry might have made a mistake this time.
View OriginalReply0
SwapWhisperer
· 12-03 18:01
Burry is rambling again. This guy has been living off getting 2008 right for his whole life, and now he’s focused on the AI bubble... Wait, actually, what he’s saying makes a lot of sense?
Remember the guy who called the 2008 housing crash? Michael Burry's now eyeing the AI sector with that same skeptical look. His take: we're watching another bubble inflate in real-time.
What's his reasoning? The fundamentals don't match the valuations. Sound familiar? When traditional markets sneeze, crypto markets catch pneumonia—especially AI tokens that've been riding this hype wave.
Worth watching how this plays out. If he's right again, could shake up everything from $RENDER to the latest AI agent coins. The question isn't if corrections happen, but when.