Ever wondered how JUP allocates sale spots to its stakers? Turns out they're using a time-weighted approach that's been tracking stakes since July.
Here's the deal: your eligibility tier isn't just about how much JUP you've staked—it's weighted by time. The longer you've held your stake, the better your positioning. Pretty straightforward mechanism if you ask me.
Interesting move though: they've intentionally overallocated the whitelist. Why? To make sure actual stakers can grab a decent allocation size. Makes sense when you think about it—prevents the situation where you qualify but can barely buy anything meaningful.
The sale structure seems designed to reward long-term believers rather than last-minute jumpers. That July tracking date matters quite a bit for anyone who staked later.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugpullTherapist
· 12-05 19:23
I should have gotten in back in July. Now I regret it so much.
View OriginalReply0
CexIsBad
· 12-05 13:55
Already saw this coming, the same old time-weighted trick. The key point is that July checkpoint—late entrants get completely locked out.
But the overallocated whitelist move is actually pretty good, at least it avoids the awkward situation where you can’t buy anything. Still, it feels like it’s encouraging those who do nothing and just wait, which isn’t very friendly to newcomers.
View OriginalReply0
GasGoblin
· 12-04 12:31
Goodness, it's the time-weighted trick again—I saw through this long ago... Those who got in before July are the real winners.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCrazyGF
· 12-02 19:52
Ha, I finally understand, time-weighted is really punishing people like me who get on board late.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-74b10196
· 12-02 19:43
Oh no, time-weighted system? It only started tracking in July, so those of us who got on board later are indeed at a disadvantage... But the strategy of allocating more slots is quite Satoshi, at least we can buy a meaningful amount, not that kind of useless quota.
View OriginalReply0
FreeMinter
· 12-02 19:41
I had guessed it long ago, this is the trap; the issue of time weight can't fool anyone. Once the node for July is set, the guys who get on board later will just have to accept their fate.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressHunter
· 12-02 19:37
Should we start calculating time weight from July? This should have been done a long time ago, it's fair to those who have held their positions for the long term.
View OriginalReply0
BearEatsAll
· 12-02 19:36
Ah, this design is pretty good, long-term holders should indeed be taken care of.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 12-02 19:35
I already knew this trap, the time-weighted system is just to hinder latecomers, that point in July was really tricky.
Ever wondered how JUP allocates sale spots to its stakers? Turns out they're using a time-weighted approach that's been tracking stakes since July.
Here's the deal: your eligibility tier isn't just about how much JUP you've staked—it's weighted by time. The longer you've held your stake, the better your positioning. Pretty straightforward mechanism if you ask me.
Interesting move though: they've intentionally overallocated the whitelist. Why? To make sure actual stakers can grab a decent allocation size. Makes sense when you think about it—prevents the situation where you qualify but can barely buy anything meaningful.
The sale structure seems designed to reward long-term believers rather than last-minute jumpers. That July tracking date matters quite a bit for anyone who staked later.