Recently, there is a project called CryptoDAO (v3 PRO) that is being promoted everywhere, but upon deeper investigation, it becomes clear that this team has a history of poor performance.

They had previously managed three projects: AKAS, OLY, and LynkCoDAO, and there are many tricks to be found in the on-chain data. The harvesting patterns of these projects are basically cast from the same mold:

AKAS played the hardest that time—publicly claiming a 1:1 ratio for minting tokens, while in reality, the team was printing tokens at zero cost in the background, then crazily dumping them when liquidity was low late at night.

The OLY project also employs similar operational methods, and specific details can be found by checking the on-chain transfer records.

I advise everyone to spend some time researching the team's background before participating in any new project. Projects that have beautifully designed PPTs and grand visions, but whose operators have a messy history, can basically be passed on.