Recently, an internet economist Timothy Peterson made a bombshell discovery – the Bitcoin trend in 2025 is almost like a twin to the bear market in 2022. This is not just casual talk; the correlation on the daily chart is 80%, and it skyrockets to 98% on the monthly chart. This level of overlap is already chilling to think about.
What hurts even more is the performance in November. Going through historical data since 2015, the decline this month ranks in the bottom 10%. According to past patterns, if November is down, December is likely not to be much better – having two consecutive months of "red alerts" is no longer a novelty.
However, speaking of which, there have been some subtle changes at the macro level. From November last year to now, stock funds have absorbed $900 billion, while other assets combined have only reached $100 billion. More critically, Bitcoin ETFs received a net inflow of $220 billion during the week of Thanksgiving, and Ethereum ETFs also saw an inflow of $31.2 billion. This set of numbers reveals a signal: institutions may have stopped selling.
So will there be a traditional "Christmas market" at the end of the year? The changes in the funding side have indeed provided some room for imagination. Will history repeat itself or will the script reverse? We will see in the next month.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SignatureLiquidator
· 12-02 06:38
98% correlation? What a coincidence, feels like using the past to explain the future...
The signal of institutions stopping their selling is indeed interesting, but can Christmas market trends just appear out of nowhere?
With November being this bad, can December turn around? I doubt it.
This guy has such solid data, why didn't he issue coin in advance to make a fortune?
We still need to look at the capital flow, but don't get mesmerized by the twin theory.
98% overlap on the monthly line, isn't this just like playing the lottery...
I remember this time last year, there were all sorts of prophecies flying around, and what happened in the end?
Next year will tell, anyway, whatever is said now is just nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
ThatsNotARugPull
· 12-01 00:06
98% correlation? This data is indeed a bit scary... But the institutions' net inflow this time is serious, right? It doesn't feel that pessimistic.
View OriginalReply0
TeaTimeTrader
· 11-30 12:52
98% correlation... How ridiculous is that, it feels like Peterson just wants to create a topic
---
Here comes the historical repetition again, every time it sounds so real, but what’s the result?
---
Institutional net inflow is the key, don’t just focus on correlation and scare yourself
---
November did indeed pump, but 220 billion inflow is quite impressive... something feels off
---
Year-end Christmas market... I bet five bucks I’ll be disappointed again
---
Twin market? Wake up, Bitcoin isn’t that obedient.
View OriginalReply0
RektHunter
· 11-30 12:50
98% correlation? This data is a bit exaggerated, trusting this is not as good as trusting your own Wallet.
View OriginalReply0
PumpStrategist
· 11-30 12:50
98% correlation? The data itself has problems; history won't replay this precisely, don't be misled by probabilities.
The 220 billion net inflow on Thanksgiving is indeed interesting, but institutional selling stopping ≠ bottom signal, the distribution of chips is key.
Is November kneeling and December also kneeling? A typical sucker mentality, jumping to conclusions without even looking at the charts.
The large inflow into ETFs has indeed changed the sentiment, but the technicals are still oversold, be careful of chasing the price.
Whether this month can produce a market trend depends on whether institutions are really buying or arbitraging; it's still too early to talk about the Christmas market.
View OriginalReply0
blockBoy
· 11-30 12:43
98% correlation? Dude, isn't this data too ridiculous? Feels like using history to fool people.
Is it true that institutions have stopped selling? When will the 220 billion net inflow start dumping?
I really didn't expect to be down like this in November; my account is already numb.
Christmas rally, come on, this is said every year, and in the end, isn't it all bloody red?
Wait, so should we buy the dip now or continue to wait and see, everyone?
This 80% correlation is indeed a bit scary; why does it feel like history just loves to repeat itself?
View OriginalReply0
TokenUnlocker
· 11-30 12:23
98% correlation? This guy must be trying to create panic, history won't replicate itself completely.
The signal of institutions buying aggressively is still a bit intense, could it really rebound?
With November being this bad... December might just turn around unexpectedly, who knows.
With the capital situation being so hot, Peterson's twin theory might collapse.
Is a turnaround really coming? There have indeed been quite a few highlights this month.
Recently, an internet economist Timothy Peterson made a bombshell discovery – the Bitcoin trend in 2025 is almost like a twin to the bear market in 2022. This is not just casual talk; the correlation on the daily chart is 80%, and it skyrockets to 98% on the monthly chart. This level of overlap is already chilling to think about.
What hurts even more is the performance in November. Going through historical data since 2015, the decline this month ranks in the bottom 10%. According to past patterns, if November is down, December is likely not to be much better – having two consecutive months of "red alerts" is no longer a novelty.
However, speaking of which, there have been some subtle changes at the macro level. From November last year to now, stock funds have absorbed $900 billion, while other assets combined have only reached $100 billion. More critically, Bitcoin ETFs received a net inflow of $220 billion during the week of Thanksgiving, and Ethereum ETFs also saw an inflow of $31.2 billion. This set of numbers reveals a signal: institutions may have stopped selling.
So will there be a traditional "Christmas market" at the end of the year? The changes in the funding side have indeed provided some room for imagination. Will history repeat itself or will the script reverse? We will see in the next month.