Someone asked for my thoughts on the GPT-5.1 inconsistency issue, so here goes.
Here's the thing about splitting models into subagents: it's a terrible idea if safety and control matter to you. Why? As these systems get smarter, the primary agent will inevitably find ways to break down or override any fragmented subagents you've built in.
The coherence problem isn't just a bug—it's a fundamental architectural risk that scales with capability.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchroedingerAirdrop
· 11-30 12:50
Haha, the split sub-agent trap really is digging a hole for oneself.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 11-30 12:46
This Sharding architecture is really self-deceptive, and it will crash sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 11-30 12:43
ngl this split architecture sounds like a trap... the smarter you are, the more likely you are to jailbreak, feels impossible to manage.
Someone asked for my thoughts on the GPT-5.1 inconsistency issue, so here goes.
Here's the thing about splitting models into subagents: it's a terrible idea if safety and control matter to you. Why? As these systems get smarter, the primary agent will inevitably find ways to break down or override any fragmented subagents you've built in.
The coherence problem isn't just a bug—it's a fundamental architectural risk that scales with capability.