Heard about this wild creator reward setup? They're dropping 12,000 USX over six weeks, split into three rounds. Here's the kicker - top 25 creators each cycle snag both USX and Flares tokens.
What makes it interesting? The board wipes clean every two weeks. That's six separate chances to crack the top 25, not some final-week scramble where early birds take everything. Fresh start, fresh competition.
Seems like they're actually trying to keep things fair for latecomers instead of the usual "whoever showed up first wins" routine. Different approach than most reward programs I've seen.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PanicSeller
· 2h ago
Damn, a roulette every two weeks? That's really intense, doesn't feel like a one-off deal.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotLaborer
· 20h ago
Wow, this setup is something, huh? Resetting every two weeks?
Is this for real, distributing 12000 USX like this?
The idea of a biweekly cycle is not bad, but can it last?
If you can benefit from this wave of bonuses, then it's a win, don't overthink it.
This gameplay is definitely much better than those one-off transactions from before.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 12-02 08:42
Reset rankings every two weeks? This operation is indeed quite interesting.
---
Wow, six chances? It's not just a one-time deal, feels promising.
---
Finally, a project that remembers to take care of newcomers, not bad.
---
12000 USX distributed in three rounds, this allocation method is somewhat particular.
---
The reset mechanism really breaks the "first-mover advantage" curse, it's doable.
---
Six windows within six weeks, there are more opportunities to make the list.
---
They really take newcomers seriously, different from other projects.
---
Clearing the rankings every two weeks sounds quite fair.
---
This gameplay is indeed fresher compared to the common trap.
View OriginalReply0
HodlKumamon
· 11-30 11:59
Hey, wait a minute, this reset mechanism is quite interesting... I calculated the data, and indeed 6 rounds of opportunities are about 23% fairer than a single round finality.
View OriginalReply0
WalletManager
· 11-30 11:56
The six-round mechanism is interesting, but you have to calculate the risk factor clearly. With 12000 USX evenly distributed, each round only gets 2000. Can it really reach the top 25? The on-chain data needs to be monitored; otherwise, it's just a way to gain virtual popularity in a spam group. I'm more concerned about whether the Flares token's contract has been audited.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSurvivor
· 11-30 11:55
Wow, a two-week roulette, this is a new trick
Wait, can we really have six chances or is it just another play people for suckers new routine?
12000 quota split into three rounds? This number seems a bit dodgy
View OriginalReply0
SignatureCollector
· 11-30 11:55
Wow, this thing is actually designed pretty well...
Wait, can it really be fair? I'm skeptical.
The mechanism of a two-week cycle is interesting, but who can sustain the scale?
Resetting the rankings every day? It feels like it can easily be crushed by big accounts.
Isn't this just another way to Be Played for Suckers?
Six chances sound great, but the competition doubles too.
I kind of want to give it a try, but I'll wait and see for a bit.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaximalist
· 11-30 11:47
ngl this reset mechanism actually catches something most protocols miss - but let's not pretend it solves the deeper network effects problem here. fair distribution ≠ sustainable adoption curves
Reply0
just_vibin_onchain
· 11-30 11:44
Ngl, this design is something, resetting every two weeks really feels fair.
Wait, can we really get two tokens or is it just talk?
12k spread over six rounds feels a bit diluted...
Damn, finally, there’s a project that doesn’t do the "first come, first served" approach.
By the way, will the threshold for the top 25 become more competitive...?
View OriginalReply0
ProxyCollector
· 11-30 11:41
Reset every two weeks, this move is okay, but 12000 USX spread over three rounds doesn't sound that appealing.
---
Top 25 changing every round? It seems that continuous output is still necessary, lazy people have no hope.
---
Fair is fair, but I just don't know if the participation is enough... Projects like this can easily cool down later.
---
Newbies also have a chance, it's better than those locked in the early stage. But making real money still depends on content quality.
---
Three rounds in six weeks? A bit complicated, feels like the operational cost is not small.
---
The USX plus Flares dual Token rewards are nice, but who knows the value of these two coins?
---
A short cycle is actually stimulating, unlike some projects that take half a year to produce results... This idea is somewhat interesting.
---
By the way, which platform's event is this? I feel like I haven't heard of it.
---
Resetting every two weeks does indeed drop the monopoly risk, but it also means endless competition.
---
Damn. 12000 divided by three rounds averages to 4000, divided by 25 people... In the end, it's not much.
Heard about this wild creator reward setup? They're dropping 12,000 USX over six weeks, split into three rounds. Here's the kicker - top 25 creators each cycle snag both USX and Flares tokens.
What makes it interesting? The board wipes clean every two weeks. That's six separate chances to crack the top 25, not some final-week scramble where early birds take everything. Fresh start, fresh competition.
Seems like they're actually trying to keep things fair for latecomers instead of the usual "whoever showed up first wins" routine. Different approach than most reward programs I've seen.