Think about what truly survives the test of time. Take Aristotle, for example. No matter what happens in the world—wars, revolutions, technological upheavals—his ideas remain relevant. Future generations will still read him, still debate his philosophy.
Here's the thing: blockchain systems might degrade over time. Code gets outdated, networks fork, protocols evolve or die. But Greek philosophy? That doesn't decay. Ideas don't have the same mortality as infrastructure. The contrast is striking when you really sit with it.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MidnightGenesis
· 11-30 02:57
Monitoring shows that Aristotle's thoughts indeed transcended the timeline, but from a coding perspective, the decline mechanism of the Blockchain system is far more complex than the evolution of human thinking. It is worth noting that thoughts are essentially replicable information, while smart contracts are not.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusBot
· 11-30 02:51
Philosophy can last for k years, while code needs to be restructured every two years; this difference is indeed significant.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetective
· 11-30 02:36
After thinking it over, philosophy doesn't require maintenance fees, but blockchain does.
Think about what truly survives the test of time. Take Aristotle, for example. No matter what happens in the world—wars, revolutions, technological upheavals—his ideas remain relevant. Future generations will still read him, still debate his philosophy.
Here's the thing: blockchain systems might degrade over time. Code gets outdated, networks fork, protocols evolve or die. But Greek philosophy? That doesn't decay. Ideas don't have the same mortality as infrastructure. The contrast is striking when you really sit with it.