I’ve been watching these so-called “mathematical models” in crypto for years now, and bonding curves might be the slickest trick yet. They’re being sold as some brilliant innovation, but let me tell you what I see - just another way to extract money from eager newcomers while pretending it’s all “automated” and “fair.”
So what exactly is this bonding curve nonsense? It’s supposedly a mathematical function that links token price directly to supply. Buy tokens, price goes up. Sell tokens, price goes down. Simple enough, right? Too simple, if you ask me.
When I first encountered these curves on platforms like pump.fun (more like dump.fun), I was immediately suspicious. The whole premise feels like a dressed-up Ponzi with a math degree. Early buyers get the best prices, then as more suckers - I mean “investors” - pile in, those early folks can cash out at a premium. Sound familiar?
What particularly irks me is how these projects pretend this is somehow revolutionary. Supply and demand have existed for centuries! Slapping some fancy algorithm on top doesn’t change the fundamentals - it just obscures them behind technical jargon.
I’ve watched countless projects implement these curves - linear, exponential, logarithmic, whatever flavor sounds most impressive in their marketing materials. But the end result is nearly always the same: retail traders holding bags while project founders and early insiders make off with profits.
The trading platforms promoting these models are no better. They position themselves as “decentralized” and “community-driven” while carefully designing systems that extract maximum value. When they talk about “incentivizing early participation,” what they really mean is “rewarding speculators who pump our token before dumping on latecomers.”
Don’t be fooled by pretty graphs and mathematical formulas. At their core, most bonding curve projects are just repackaging the oldest game in finance - getting in early and selling to those who come later at inflated prices.
While there might be legitimate uses for such models in specific circumstances, the crypto market is using them primarily as sophisticated-looking price manipulation mechanisms. I’ve yet to see one that truly benefits all participants equally.
The math might be sound, but the intention behind it rarely is. Remember that next time someone tries selling you on a token with a “revolutionary bonding curve mechanism.”
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The Bonding Curve Con: My Take on Crypto's Latest "Mathematical" Facade
I’ve been watching these so-called “mathematical models” in crypto for years now, and bonding curves might be the slickest trick yet. They’re being sold as some brilliant innovation, but let me tell you what I see - just another way to extract money from eager newcomers while pretending it’s all “automated” and “fair.”
So what exactly is this bonding curve nonsense? It’s supposedly a mathematical function that links token price directly to supply. Buy tokens, price goes up. Sell tokens, price goes down. Simple enough, right? Too simple, if you ask me.
When I first encountered these curves on platforms like pump.fun (more like dump.fun), I was immediately suspicious. The whole premise feels like a dressed-up Ponzi with a math degree. Early buyers get the best prices, then as more suckers - I mean “investors” - pile in, those early folks can cash out at a premium. Sound familiar?
What particularly irks me is how these projects pretend this is somehow revolutionary. Supply and demand have existed for centuries! Slapping some fancy algorithm on top doesn’t change the fundamentals - it just obscures them behind technical jargon.
I’ve watched countless projects implement these curves - linear, exponential, logarithmic, whatever flavor sounds most impressive in their marketing materials. But the end result is nearly always the same: retail traders holding bags while project founders and early insiders make off with profits.
The trading platforms promoting these models are no better. They position themselves as “decentralized” and “community-driven” while carefully designing systems that extract maximum value. When they talk about “incentivizing early participation,” what they really mean is “rewarding speculators who pump our token before dumping on latecomers.”
Don’t be fooled by pretty graphs and mathematical formulas. At their core, most bonding curve projects are just repackaging the oldest game in finance - getting in early and selling to those who come later at inflated prices.
While there might be legitimate uses for such models in specific circumstances, the crypto market is using them primarily as sophisticated-looking price manipulation mechanisms. I’ve yet to see one that truly benefits all participants equally.
The math might be sound, but the intention behind it rarely is. Remember that next time someone tries selling you on a token with a “revolutionary bonding curve mechanism.”