Introduction: Investment Comparison of BMON vs ICP
In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between Binamon (BMON) vs Internet Computer (ICP) has been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different positioning in the crypto asset landscape.
Binamon (BMON): Since its launch, it has gained market recognition as a complete digital monster metaspace on the BSC.
Internet Computer (ICP): Since its inception, it has been hailed as a decentralized cloud blockchain, hosting secure and resilient apps, websites, and enterprise systems.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between BMON and ICP, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question investors care about most:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
BMON and ICP Historical Price Trends
- 2021: ICP reached its all-time high of $700.65 on May 11, 2021, shortly after its launch.
- 2025: BMON hit its all-time low of $0.00215932 on November 21, 2025, showing a significant decline from its peak.
- Comparative analysis: Since their respective peaks, BMON has fallen from $0.813157 to $0.002304, while ICP has dropped from $700.65 to $4.165, both experiencing substantial declines.
Current Market Situation (2025-11-27)
- BMON current price: $0.002304
- ICP current price: $4.165
- 24-hour trading volume: BMON $11,555.37 vs ICP $2,101,844.58
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 22 (Extreme Fear)
Click to view real-time prices:

II. Core Factors Affecting the Investment Value of BMON vs ICP
Supply Mechanism Comparison (Tokenomics)
-
BMON: Fixed supply of 1 billion tokens with deflationary mechanisms including token burning through gameplay
-
ICP: Inflationary model with new tokens minted as rewards for node operators and governance participation
-
📌 Historical Pattern: Deflationary tokens like BMON typically perform better during bull markets, while ICP's controlled inflation supports network growth but may dilute value over time.
Institutional Adoption and Market Applications
- Institutional Holdings: ICP has stronger institutional backing with involvement from Andreessen Horowitz and Polychain Capital
- Enterprise Adoption: ICP has greater enterprise integration through Internet Computer Protocol's infrastructure while BMON remains primarily gaming-focused
- Regulatory Attitudes: Both face varying regulatory approaches across jurisdictions, with gaming tokens like BMON generally facing less scrutiny than infrastructure tokens like ICP
Technical Development and Ecosystem Building
- BMON Technical Upgrades: Focus on gaming mechanics, NFT functionality, and cross-chain compatibility
- ICP Technical Development: Continuous improvement of its blockchain architecture, smart contract capabilities, and Web3 infrastructure
- Ecosystem Comparison: ICP has a broader ecosystem spanning DeFi, NFTs, and enterprise solutions, while BMON is concentrated in GameFi and the Binamon metaverse
Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles
- Inflation Performance: ICP has positioned itself as "blockchain singularity" with potential inflation resistance, while BMON's value is more tied to gaming market trends
- Monetary Policy Effects: Both tokens show sensitivity to interest rates and dollar strength, with ICP demonstrating higher correlation to traditional tech investments
- Geopolitical Factors: ICP's decentralized internet vision addresses global censorship concerns, while BMON's gaming focus makes it less affected by cross-border regulatory issues
III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: BMON vs ICP
Short-term Prediction (2025)
- BMON: Conservative $0.00140544 - $0.002304 | Optimistic $0.002304 - $0.00269568
- ICP: Conservative $2.839 - $4.175 | Optimistic $4.175 - $6.0955
Mid-term Prediction (2027)
- BMON may enter a growth phase, with expected price range $0.0020717424 - $0.002872816128
- ICP may enter a bullish market, with expected price range $3.882249 - $8.565597
- Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETF, ecosystem development
Long-term Prediction (2030)
- BMON: Base scenario $0.002808316060831 - $0.003955374733564 | Optimistic scenario $0.003955374733564 - $0.004192697217578
- ICP: Base scenario $4.5279962013195 - $8.7076850025375 | Optimistic scenario $8.7076850025375 - $9.143069252664375
View detailed price predictions for BMON and ICP
Disclaimer
BMON:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
0.00269568 |
0.002304 |
0.00140544 |
0 |
| 2026 |
0.0030248064 |
0.00249984 |
0.0023998464 |
8 |
| 2027 |
0.002872816128 |
0.0027623232 |
0.0020717424 |
19 |
| 2028 |
0.00374736765312 |
0.002817569664 |
0.00205682585472 |
22 |
| 2029 |
0.004628280808569 |
0.00328246865856 |
0.001706883702451 |
42 |
| 2030 |
0.004192697217578 |
0.003955374733564 |
0.002808316060831 |
71 |
ICP:
| 年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
| 2025 |
6.0955 |
4.175 |
2.839 |
0 |
| 2026 |
7.18935 |
5.13525 |
4.1082 |
23 |
| 2027 |
8.565597 |
6.1623 |
3.882249 |
47 |
| 2028 |
7.584866955 |
7.3639485 |
3.902892705 |
76 |
| 2029 |
9.940962277575 |
7.4744077275 |
7.02594326385 |
79 |
| 2030 |
9.143069252664375 |
8.7076850025375 |
4.5279962013195 |
108 |
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: BMON vs ICP
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies
- BMON: Suitable for investors focused on gaming and metaverse potential
- ICP: Suitable for investors looking for broader blockchain infrastructure and Web3 applications
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: BMON: 20% vs ICP: 80%
- Aggressive investors: BMON: 40% vs ICP: 60%
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolios
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risks
- BMON: High volatility due to gaming market trends and smaller market cap
- ICP: Susceptible to broader crypto market sentiment and tech sector performance
Technical Risks
- BMON: Scalability, network stability in gaming environments
- ICP: Centralization concerns, potential security vulnerabilities in complex infrastructure
Regulatory Risks
- Global regulatory policies may have different impacts on gaming tokens (BMON) versus infrastructure tokens (ICP)
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- BMON advantages: Niche gaming focus, potential for rapid growth in bull markets
- ICP advantages: Broader ecosystem, stronger institutional backing, potential for enterprise adoption
✅ Investment Advice:
- New investors: Consider a small allocation to ICP as part of a diversified crypto portfolio
- Experienced investors: Balanced approach with both BMON and ICP, adjusting based on market cycles
- Institutional investors: Focus on ICP for its infrastructure potential and institutional-grade offerings
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile, and this article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the main differences between BMON and ICP?
A: BMON is a gaming-focused token for the Binamon metaverse, while ICP is a broader blockchain infrastructure project. BMON has a fixed supply with deflationary mechanisms, whereas ICP has an inflationary model. ICP has stronger institutional backing and a wider ecosystem spanning DeFi, NFTs, and enterprise solutions.
Q2: Which token has performed better historically?
A: Both tokens have experienced significant declines from their all-time highs. ICP reached a peak of $700.65 in May 2021, while BMON's all-time high was $0.813157. As of November 27, 2025, ICP is trading at $4.165, and BMON at $0.002304.
Q3: What are the key factors affecting the investment value of BMON and ICP?
A: Key factors include supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technical development, ecosystem building, macroeconomic factors, and market cycles. ICP generally has stronger institutional backing and a broader ecosystem, while BMON focuses on gaming and metaverse applications.
Q4: What are the price predictions for BMON and ICP by 2030?
A: For BMON, the base scenario predicts a range of $0.002808316060831 - $0.003955374733564, with an optimistic scenario of $0.003955374733564 - $0.004192697217578. For ICP, the base scenario predicts $4.5279962013195 - $8.7076850025375, with an optimistic scenario of $8.7076850025375 - $9.143069252664375.
Q5: How should investors approach allocating between BMON and ICP?
A: Conservative investors might consider allocating 20% to BMON and 80% to ICP, while aggressive investors might opt for 40% BMON and 60% ICP. The allocation should be based on individual risk tolerance and investment goals.
Q6: What are the main risks associated with investing in BMON and ICP?
A: Market risks include high volatility, especially for BMON due to its smaller market cap. Technical risks involve scalability issues for BMON and potential centralization concerns for ICP. Regulatory risks may affect both tokens differently, with gaming tokens like BMON potentially facing less scrutiny than infrastructure tokens like ICP.