Black Mirror (MIRROR), as the official token of the Black Mirror ecosystem, has emerged as a unique asset bridging entertainment, Web3, and interactive storytelling since its inception. As of 2025, MIRROR's market capitalization has reached $620,446, with a circulating supply of approximately 187,786,590 tokens, and a price hovering around $0.003304. This asset, dubbed the "dystopian experience token," is playing an increasingly crucial role in shaping immersive, participatory experiences in the realms of interactive apps, social experiences, and tokenized rewards.
This article will comprehensively analyze MIRROR's price trends from 2025 to 2030, taking into account historical patterns, market supply and demand, ecosystem development, and macroeconomic factors, to provide investors with professional price predictions and practical investment strategies.
As of November 26, 2025, MIRROR is trading at $0.003304. The token has experienced a 2.96% decrease in the last 24 hours, with a trading volume of $100,136.50. MIRROR's market capitalization currently stands at $620,446.90, ranking it at 3050 in the global cryptocurrency market.
The token's circulating supply is 187,786,590.95 MIRROR, which represents 9.6% of its total supply of 1,000,000,000 tokens. The fully diluted market cap is $3,304,000.00.
MIRROR has shown significant downward pressure in recent periods, with a 31.019% decrease over the past week and a substantial 70.08% decline in the last 30 days. This downtrend suggests bearish sentiment in the short to medium term.
The token's all-time high of $0.08582 was achieved on September 9, 2025, while its all-time low of $0.003265 was recorded just three days ago on November 23, 2025. This recent low indicates that MIRROR is currently trading near its historical bottom.
Click to view the current MIRROR market price

2025-11-26 Fear and Greed Index: 20 (Extreme Fear)
Click to view the current Fear & Greed Index
The crypto market is experiencing extreme fear, with the Fear and Greed Index plummeting to 20. This indicates a highly pessimistic sentiment among investors, potentially creating oversold conditions. While caution is warranted, historically, such extreme fear has often preceded market rebounds. Savvy traders may view this as an opportunity to accumulate, adhering to the adage "be fearful when others are greedy, and greedy when others are fearful." However, always conduct thorough research and manage risks prudently.

The address holdings distribution data for MIRROR reveals a highly concentrated ownership structure. The top address holds 37.76% of the total supply, with the top five addresses collectively controlling 80.9% of all MIRROR tokens. This level of concentration indicates a significant centralization of power within the MIRROR ecosystem.
Such a concentrated distribution raises concerns about market stability and potential price manipulation. With a small number of addresses holding the majority of tokens, there's an increased risk of large-scale sell-offs or coordinated actions that could dramatically impact MIRROR's market price. Furthermore, this concentration may undermine the project's claims of decentralization, as decision-making power is effectively consolidated among a few key players.
The current address distribution suggests a relatively immature market structure for MIRROR, with limited widespread adoption among retail investors. This concentration could lead to increased volatility and susceptibility to whale movements, potentially deterring new investors and impeding organic market growth. Stakeholders should monitor any shifts in this distribution, as a more balanced spread could indicate improving market health and reduced manipulation risks.
Click to view the current MIRROR Holdings Distribution

| Top | Address | Holding Qty | Holding (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0xcf0b...c806da | 377658.04K | 37.76% |
| 2 | 0xe261...82431d | 194404.74K | 19.44% |
| 3 | 0xb82d...93f751 | 103101.57K | 10.31% |
| 4 | 0xab2b...8a838b | 98999.99K | 9.89% |
| 5 | 0x19c4...095f84 | 35000.00K | 3.50% |
| - | Others | 190835.67K | 19.1% |
| 年份 | 预测最高价 | 预测平均价格 | 预测最低价 | 涨跌幅 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.00367 | 0.00331 | 0.00218 | 0 |
| 2026 | 0.00517 | 0.00349 | 0.00328 | 5 |
| 2027 | 0.00524 | 0.00433 | 0.00372 | 30 |
| 2028 | 0.00516 | 0.00478 | 0.00277 | 44 |
| 2029 | 0.00656 | 0.00497 | 0.00333 | 50 |
| 2030 | 0.00848 | 0.00577 | 0.00485 | 74 |
(1) Long-term Holding Strategy
(2) Active Trading Strategy
(1) Asset Allocation Principles
(2) Risk Hedging Solutions
(3) Secure Storage Solutions
MIRROR presents a unique opportunity in the entertainment-crypto crossover space, with potential for growth tied to the Black Mirror brand. However, it carries significant short-term risks due to market volatility and the nascent stage of the project.
✅ Beginners: Consider small, experimental positions to understand the market dynamics
✅ Experienced investors: Implement a dollar-cost averaging strategy with strict risk management
✅ Institutional investors: Conduct thorough due diligence and consider MIRROR as part of a diversified crypto portfolio
Cryptocurrency investments carry extremely high risks, and this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should make decisions cautiously based on their own risk tolerance and are advised to consult professional financial advisors. Never invest more than you can afford to lose.
Yes, Mirror protocol shows potential for recovery. With ongoing development and growing DeFi adoption, it may regain momentum in the crypto market by 2025.
Bitcoin is the most likely cryptocurrency to reach $1000 by 2030, with Ethereum also having a strong potential. Other promising candidates include Cardano, Solana, and Polkadot.
Yes, Solana could potentially reach $1000 in 2025. With its high-speed blockchain and growing ecosystem, Solana has the potential for significant price appreciation, especially if crypto market conditions remain favorable.
It's unlikely XRP will reach $100 in 2025. While XRP has potential for growth, a $100 price would require a massive market cap increase, which is not realistic in the given timeframe.
Share
Content