On @KaitoAI I’m now appearing on leaderboards for projects I’ve never mentioned, no idea what they even do.
It also seems like it now takes a few days for your posts to affect your mindshare.
It took 3 days for my @Polkadot post to impact my mindshare.

Many of you ask me what @campnetworkxyz potential FDV could be.
But you’re all making the same mistake; you value it as a DeFi protocol based on its TVL or hype. Camp is different.
The core of their business is monetizable IP, and that’s already a massive industry in Web2.
Camp can be compared to traditional IP giants such as:
+ Shutterstock
+ BMI
+ Getty Images
+ Adobe Stock
+ Spotify (
Let's consider 3 possible scenarios to estimate Camp’s annual revenue. It’s clear they won’t reach the same scale as these long-established Web2 companies, but the potential can still be significant:
+ Conserv

. @KaitoAI new upgrade is really bad.
I tested it yesterday and was really disappointed with the results.
I made a post about @Polkadot that got good engagement. Usually, before the upgrade, a post like that would have significantly boosted my mindshare percentage.
I monitored my mindshare before and after posting, and there was zero change, as if it hadn’t been counted at all.
The biggest risk here is that it could discourage good writers.
Personally, I don’t care about Yaps or leaderboards, I’ll keep sharing my ideas and journey with or without mindshare.
I was here before Kaito, and I’ll st

. @KaitoAI just upgraded its algorithm, and something tells me we won’t see as many “reply guys” anymore.
Here’s the main changes:
+ Reputation now matters, it’s tailored to each leaderboard. This means getting mentioned or talked about by smart followers now has a big impact.
+ Replies no longer count toward rankings, no more reply farming.
+ Reputation filters will exclude newly created accounts, bought followers, and paid engagement.
Upcoming improvements:
+ gKAITO mechanism: unites all ecosystem participants and attracts more high-value creators.
+ Allow creators to signal their focus and

I know many will disagree, but from a technical pov, @Polkadot is the most complete blockchain.
1/ It’s the most decentralized thanks to its unique OpenGov governance system, which gives real decision-making power to the community.
Unlike most chains where a small group controls upgrades and treasury spending, Polkadot lets anyone propose changes, vote on referenda, and even manage the treasury, all on-chain, without intermediaries.
2/ It also achieves one of the highest TPS.
Unlike monolithic chains, Polkadot uses a relay chain + parachains model, where each parachain runs in parallel and pro

X is a goldmine if you want to build advanced knowledge and spot opportunities before everyone else.
It’s where information drops first, where analysts share their insights, where networking is easiest, and where you’ll find the richest alpha on upcoming projects.
But to truly make the most of it, you need to follow the right accounts.
Here’s a curated list to get you started:
+ @atoms_res
Shares deep research and good opportunities, whether it’s testnet farming or hidden gems. A great follow to stay ahead of the curve.
+ @el_crypto_prof
Posts daily technical analysis with clear breakdowns. Pe

One of the first protocols I ever used on Solana was @MarinadeFinance, and that was over 4 years ago.
It’s a great example of a project where the Mcap is completely disconnected from the TVL. $2B in TVL, but only $47M in Mcap.
Now, they’re finally making moves to bring valuation closer to fundamentals:
+ 50% of all revenue will be used for token buybacks starting in September
+ A proposal to burn 10% of the total supply is coming
+ First staking provider ever to be included in a US ETF S-1 filing
The gap between value and price might not last much longer.

To truly understand a project, you need to understand what it brings compared to its competitors.
For years, institutions like SACEM (France), BMI (USA), and YouTube CMS have dominated copyright and royalty management.
But their systems are outdated, full of high fees, lack of transparency, and slow processes.
@campnetworkxyz introduces a whole new paradigm, every piece of content becomes a programmable onchain asset, with attribution, licensing, and royalties built in from the start.
Many of you asked me what’s the real difference, in plain terms? No technical jargon.
So here it is, I scored

The FairFlow concept by @KyberNetwork is worth a closer look.
It’s a Uniswap V4 (and similar protocols) hook that lets LPs earn more, without doing anything extra.
The idea is to redirect arbitrage value that would normally be captured by external arbitrageurs back to the LPs.
1/ It blocks external arbitrageurs
2/ Absorbs Captures arbitrage value
3/ Redistributes them to LPs
4/ LP tokens remain usable elsewhere (like in liquid staking)

Let’s make a very simple comparison so you can understand how powerful @campnetworkxyz is.
You can think of it as a combination of YouTube, Spotify, and GitHub.
Ok, let me explain!
+ Why YouTube?
Creators can publish original content (audio, video, text) on Camp, set their own usage and monetization rules, and license IP tokens to others.
It brings YouTube-style monetization, but with full ownership and control.
+ Why Spotify?
By tokenizing IP rights, creators can sell or lease streaming and usage licenses.
This enables a streaming + micropayments model, all enforced by smart contracts.
It’s t

You’re wrong if you think @PythNetwork is just another oracle. It’s much more than that, it’s a price layer.
Yeah I know it’s not bigger than Chainlink in terms of Mcap but it addresses a much larger Total Addressable Market (TAM) and has a broader long-term vision.
Pyth is not limited to crypto. It also covers traditional financial assets such as equities, FX, ETFs, commodities, and interest rates.
This puts it in the financial data market valued at $50B annually.
Unlike Pyth, Chainlink focuses mainly on on-chain data and cross-chain infrastructure.
Its TAM is large but primarily limited t

Rn most AIs takes without asking. @campnetworkxyz changes that and acts like Tinder + Swiss Bank.
Yeah may sound like a strange comparison but let me explain.
Every time an AI model or another creator wants to use your music, art, or content, you get to approve it. It’s fully consent‑based. It’s like Tinder for your IP.
And once it’s used, Camp works like a Swiss Bank:
+ Your rights are protected.
+ Every transaction is secure and onchain.
+ Royalties flow to you automatically, without leaks or delays.