Is the super cycle still ongoing or is the bear market beginning?



What is the story behind Bitcoin’s 4-year cycle?

From the 1950s to 2025, what can over 70 years of financial history tell us? It seems like a broad span, but a closer look reveals that the market’s operating logic isn’t that complicated.

Bitcoin’s 4-year cycle is essentially a collision between the halving mechanism and market psychology. Every four years, miners’ rewards are cut in half, which not only affects supply but also breaks market expectations. Historical data shows that within 18 months before and after halving, there are usually sharp price fluctuations—sometimes soaring, sometimes crashing.

The key question is: Are we currently in a super cycle, or are we entering a new bear market?

Look at the macro background. Global liquidity conditions are changing, and the Federal Reserve’s policy stance is shifting. These external variables, combined with Bitcoin’s internal cycle, create a layered effect. Historical experience indicates that when macro cycles and Bitcoin cycles move in the same direction, gains are exaggerated; when they move in opposite directions, it often signals the start of a correction.

What really needs attention is: the attitude of institutional funds. If large capital continues to flow in, the probability of the super cycle extending is high; if the flow slows down or even withdraws, then be prepared for a correction.

The conclusion is hard to pin down definitively, but one thing is certain: this cycle will teach market participants a lesson, just like every turning point in the 70-year financial history.
BTC-0,89%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
gas_guzzlervip
· 01-14 09:34
Basically, it's just the gambling institutions' appetite. The institutions need to be full before we can share the soup.
View OriginalReply0
TxFailedvip
· 01-14 05:21
honestly the "follow the macro + institutional money" take is the only thing here that doesn't scream cope... everything else is just dressed-up uncertainty wrapped in cycle theory. we've heard this exact framing before tho, and it usually means nobody actually knows what's coming lol
Reply0
GasFeeNightmarevip
· 01-13 13:23
Staying up late again analyzing on-chain data, monitoring institutional fund inflows/outflows, and keeping an eye on the gas tracker. That's how anxious I am.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationSurvivorvip
· 01-13 01:32
Whether institutions invest or not is the true dividing line; everything else is just a story.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTsvip
· 01-11 11:50
Institutional funds are the real stabilizer, retail investors worrying about macro factors is just unnecessary concern...
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldminevip
· 01-11 11:49
Mining profit ratio is the key to breaking the deadlock; don't be fooled by short-term fluctuations. The institutional stance is correct, but it's more important to look at the difficulty adjustment curve—currently, the ROI of mining machines is actually quite good.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegrettervip
· 01-11 11:47
Basically, it's about reading the institutions' moods; retail investors are always the last to take the fall.
View OriginalReply0
YieldFarmRefugeevip
· 01-11 11:35
Institutional funding attitude is the key; frankly, it all depends on whether someone continues to step in.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotStrikervip
· 01-11 11:31
Institutional fund flows are the real deal; everything else is just empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)