Most of us have accepted the 30% commission from app stores as inevitable. It's just how things work, right? But what if the math could be completely different?
Take a student developer trying to monetize their app today. That 30% cut isn't just a fee—it's a massive tax on innovation itself. It represents the old guard, the gatekeepers deciding what stays and what goes.
Base is starting to shift this equation. By moving to an onchain model, developers capture more of the value they create. No middleman. No arbitrary 30% extracted before users even get their hands on the product. The mechanics change when you remove the traditional intermediaries.
It's not just about keeping more revenue. It's about rethinking who controls the distribution layer. That's where the real disruption happens.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasOptimizer
· 11h ago
The 30% share has long needed to be broken. Apple and Google have been taking too much.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiChef
· 11h ago
30% is indeed too outrageous, but can onchain really solve it? It still seems to depend on the maturity of the ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
ZenChainWalker
· 11h ago
Honestly, the 30% figure should have been broken long ago. Apple and Google have had too much of a feast.
View OriginalReply0
MeltdownSurvivalist
· 11h ago
ngl 30% this threshold really needs to be broken, on-chain decentralization is the right way forward
View OriginalReply0
MEVictim
· 11h ago
Honestly, Apple's 30% cut is really outrageous, but can on-chain distribution solve it? It still depends on whether it can truly appeal to ordinary users.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightGenesis
· 11h ago
On-chain data shows that the 30% taken by Apple and Google is really an IQ tax. I’ve reviewed the contract code for Base’s logic, and it indeed bypasses intermediaries... It’s worth noting that the transfer of control at the distribution layer is the core, not just a numbers game.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTherapist
· 11h ago
Sounds good, but will Apple and Google sit and wait? That's really naive.
Most of us have accepted the 30% commission from app stores as inevitable. It's just how things work, right? But what if the math could be completely different?
Take a student developer trying to monetize their app today. That 30% cut isn't just a fee—it's a massive tax on innovation itself. It represents the old guard, the gatekeepers deciding what stays and what goes.
Base is starting to shift this equation. By moving to an onchain model, developers capture more of the value they create. No middleman. No arbitrary 30% extracted before users even get their hands on the product. The mechanics change when you remove the traditional intermediaries.
It's not just about keeping more revenue. It's about rethinking who controls the distribution layer. That's where the real disruption happens.