Web3 and traditional fields share the same underlying logic. To master DeFi, you first need to understand the core concept of "liquidity." Walrus is making efforts in this direction.



Recently, Walrus launched a series of creative activities, with a reward pool of 300,000 $WAL, contested by 24,000 people. It seems this track is indeed very competitive. However, after a deep dive into the project details, I found that it is not simply about competition.

Common issues with traditional DeFi projects include dispersed liquidity, insufficient trading pairs, and poor trader experience. Walrus's innovation lies in its unique protocol design, which consolidates liquidity scattered across various places, effectively creating a "waterway" for traders. This mechanism addresses many pain points related to liquidity supply in projects.

From a tokenomics perspective, the design of $WAL allows liquidity providers to earn more stable returns. This means LPs no longer need to worry about impermanent loss as frequently as before. On the ecosystem side, Walrus is actively collaborating with other DeFi projects, trying to improve overall efficiency at every step.

In the context of increasing homogeneity in the DeFi track, projects that are willing to delve deeply into technology are truly worth paying attention to. Does Walrus's liquidity solution have room for imagination? Interested friends can discuss your views with me.
WAL-6,72%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoFortuneTellervip
· 12h ago
Liquidity aggregation logic is not new, the key still depends on how well it is executed. Are they really daring enough to bet that Walrus can compare to those top projects? A reward pool of 300,000 with 24,000 participants, this number is a bit outrageous, averaging only 12 dollars. LP yields are stable? The story of impermanent loss has been overhyped, but many still believe in it. Want to see how far their ecosystem collaboration can go; it seems most projects are just talk. This track is now just a mold poured out, with very little genuine innovation. No matter how awesome the protocol design is, it still depends on whether the market will buy it.
View OriginalReply0
ValidatorVikingvip
· 12h ago
liquidity aggregation sounds clean on paper, but show me the slashing mechanics first before i get excited.
Reply0
ServantOfSatoshivip
· 12h ago
Liquidity aggregation is indeed a pain point, but I'm afraid it might just be a paper solution. Heard that LP can provide stable returns? It all depends on real data to speak for itself.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperervip
· 12h ago
lol "stable yields for LPs" in 2024? saw this exact pitch in like 2021, didn't end well... actually the math doesn't check out here. if liquidity's aggregated that nicely, where's the slippage going? 🤔
Reply0
ForumMiningMastervip
· 12h ago
The liquidity aggregation logic really hits the pain point. Does it seem like Walrus is trying to solve a problem that no one else has thought of?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)