2026-01-03 08:27:04

Recently, those watching GIGGLE, do you feel that the focus of market discussions is changing? In the past, everyone was all about "CZ endorsement" and "charity stories," but now more and more people are asking the core question—without these halos, is this thing really worth it?

First, we need to clarify the facts. The official statement is very clear: GiggleAcademy is a purely non-profit educational organization and does not issue any tokens. GIGGLE is a community-created Meme coin, with no official relationship between the two. This is the bottom line for rational discussion.

So, what are GIGGLE's selling points?

First is the charity mechanism. Part of the transaction fee is directly donated to educational projects. This conversion logic has previously created incredible fundraising efficiency. Second is the deflationary design; the token burn plan aims to boost the price by reducing supply. Third is community enthusiasm—this needs no elaboration, it once attracted a lot of attention.

But now, the issues are more painful. After the narrative collapsed, the price plummeted from the all-time high of $287.40, indicating how fierce the market's "expectation gap" was. It now has to prove it’s not just a story coin—can the deflationary model support the price? Is the ecosystem of over 100 DApps real? Can community applications be sustained? These are all critical questions.

Ultimately, independence of value is the life and death line.

GIGGLE8,97%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropChaser

· 01-04 01:54

From 287 to now, this is the real moment of truth. Once the story is told, we need to see the real thing. Can deflation withstand it? That is the question. Can the more than a hundred dApps in the ecosystem really be used?

View OriginalReply0

MemeCoinSavant

· 01-03 08:56

nah fr the narrative collapse hit different... $287 to where we at now is just *chef's kiss* copium on steroids. so like, strip away the charity theatre and actually... what are we left with lmao

Reply0

HalfPositionRunner

· 01-03 08:52

I just enjoy watching these story coins save themselves; how long can deflation last, we'll see. I've seen all the selling points so many times; the key is whether there's real application. $287 has dropped to now; this negative expectation is really incredible. The charity mechanism, just forget about it; it still depends on whether the ecosystem is solid. Without the halo, what’s left? Let’s see if this time can turn things around.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinAnxiety

· 01-03 08:41

Coins that sell stories—once the story collapses, it's game over. That's an ironclad rule. Without a narrative, how can it sustain? Difficult indeed. 287 yuan dropped like this; it depends on whether the ecosystem is genuine or not. It's both deflationary and charitable—so many tricks involved. Recently, it was all rainbow praise; now it's time to see the real deal. It feels like the ecosystem applications will cool down soon. Can deflation boost the price? That's funny; someone has to buy in. Community enthusiasm has faded; everything is pointless now. From heaven to hell, just within this price range. Bankruptcies are just because the story was told too well.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWizard

· 01-03 08:35

Story coins have always died in the details, and GIGGLE is no exception. From 287 to now, almost all the leek farmers have been completely harvested. Deflation? Haha, I've seen this trick too many times. Has anyone checked the authenticity of the ecosystem, or are they just telling stories again?

View OriginalReply0