Recently, the founder of Uniswap and the CEO of Aerodrome engaged in a heated discussion about the LP fee revenue structure, each side holding their own stance.
This conversation is quite interesting and reflects the competition between different approaches in the DEX space. As a leading liquidity protocol, Uniswap indeed has a mature model for fee distribution mechanisms. Meanwhile, as a newcomer, Aerodrome is experimenting with different incentive schemes to attract liquidity providers.
From a market perspective, this kind of competition in the LP ecosystem may not necessarily be a bad thing—different fee models give liquidity providers more options. Ultimately, which model can attract more capital depends on the data. The market will soon reveal how the two protocols perform.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
VirtualRichDream
· 01-04 00:53
Hey, it's the same old trick again. Latecomers scramble to cut fees, while the top players just lie back and collect rent.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMinion
· 01-03 05:49
Ha, it's another fee war. Basically, it's just a fight for liquidity.
View OriginalReply0
MemeCurator
· 01-03 05:47
Basically, it's about grabbing LP, right? Uniswap is just sitting back counting money, and Aerodrome is getting impatient.
View OriginalReply0
TokenVelocity
· 01-03 05:46
Basically, it's about competing for LP incentives. Whether Aerodrome is forced to innovate or genuinely has ideas will be seen in the follow-up.
View OriginalReply0
QuorumVoter
· 01-03 05:38
Everyone is competing fiercely, all wanting to get a piece of the LP cake.
View OriginalReply0
ponzi_poet
· 01-03 05:34
Basically, it's all about grabbing liquidity. Uni sits back and collects fees, Aero has to work hard to compete, and in the end, the one with the best data will definitely win.
Recently, the founder of Uniswap and the CEO of Aerodrome engaged in a heated discussion about the LP fee revenue structure, each side holding their own stance.
This conversation is quite interesting and reflects the competition between different approaches in the DEX space. As a leading liquidity protocol, Uniswap indeed has a mature model for fee distribution mechanisms. Meanwhile, as a newcomer, Aerodrome is experimenting with different incentive schemes to attract liquidity providers.
From a market perspective, this kind of competition in the LP ecosystem may not necessarily be a bad thing—different fee models give liquidity providers more options. Ultimately, which model can attract more capital depends on the data. The market will soon reveal how the two protocols perform.