2025-12-30 13:23:38

Another wallet security incident. On December 30th, a well-known wallet platform's official disclosed a data breach incident. The cause was that during data center expansion and system migration, some users' wallet information was accidentally exposed.

The team's response was relatively quick—they immediately isolated the affected users' assets. But the problem is that some users did not update in time or were unaware of the risk, and continued to use the original wallet addresses. This gave malicious actors an opportunity.

On December 27th, hackers successfully cracked the leaked data and then began large-scale asset transfers. Ultimately, about $250,000 USD was lost. Although the team later completed the compensation process, the cost has already been paid.

This incident serves as a reminder to everyone: infrastructure operations like data center migration and system upgrades must implement proper security isolation measures. Users should also develop good habits—regularly check accounts and immediately update credentials if anomalies are found. Wallet security is no small matter.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

bridgeOops

· 8h ago

Data center migrations can all go wrong; the infrastructure of these platforms really leaves much to be desired. --- It's unbelievable that users don't proactively update credentials, giving hackers an easy opportunity. --- $250,000 lost, and even compensation can't make up for that frustrating feeling. --- It's the same old story; even if they call it isolation, where is the real risk prevention? --- It's always like this—only scrambling to fix things after a problem occurs. --- Looking at this reaction speed, it feels like armchair strategists after the fact. --- I'm tired of hearing about regular account checks; the key platform itself needs to be reliable first.

View OriginalReply0

MEVEye

· 11h ago

Data center migrations can always go wrong. Is this security defense really just paper-thin? Here we go again, new tricks every few days. The only thing to blame is that users are still asleep while hackers have already changed their IPs. Losing 250,000 is just a loss of money, but how do you compensate for lost trust? It was about time to implement multi-signature wallets; single wallets are just this fragile. This time, it's another lesson for newcomers to remember the importance of their keys.

View OriginalReply0

AlwaysQuestioning

· 11h ago

Another blood and tears lesson, really outrageous. If compensation is possible, it's just frustrating. Why is it so hard to get things right with data center migration? The infrastructure needs to be more robust. Honestly, users also need to be more attentive. When they receive risk alerts, they should immediately change their credentials and not wait to be hacked. Losing $250,000, how many people are heartbroken? Why can't the platform be more thorough? It feels like it happens every few months. The key is, who still trusts wallets now? People are becoming more and more hesitant to store funds there.

View OriginalReply0

CoinBasedThinking

· 11h ago

Is that all? Only after losing $250,000 did you remember to check your account regularly. These people are really... It's both data center migration and system upgrades. Is this the level of a big company? Mostly, it's because users are too inexperienced. When the official announced it, there was no response, and then they got cut off.

View OriginalReply0

LightningPacketLoss

· 11h ago

Here we go again... Isn't that enough? The system migration was supposed to be smooth, but they slack off, and users end up taking the blame again. $250,000 just flew away like that. What kind of compensation is that? Truly nothing.

View OriginalReply0