True alpha is not found in emotionally driven areas, but in rational systems.
What can AI tools do? Scan the entire market and capture those undervalued signals — not relying on intuition, but on verifiable data. A recent sign worth noting: institutional funds are quietly entering the market. They are not chasing hot trends or hyping narratives, but instead seeking the most robust and reliable systems.
What does this indicate? Emotions are market noise. Genuine signals come from three things: compliance frameworks, certainty, and repeatable, verifiable processes. Stories that profit from FOMO are outdated; now, large capital focuses on mechanisms with controllable risks and clear underlying logic.
In this shift, whoever can provide such systems — transparent, stable, and auditable — will secure the next round of chips.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SadMoneyMeow
· 9h ago
Institutions are quietly making moves, while retail investors are still flooding social media with FOMO. The gap is truly remarkable.
View OriginalReply0
VitalikFanAccount
· 9h ago
Systematic thinking is indeed the foundation for long-term profits, but to be honest, I've grown a bit tired of hearing the institutional jargon.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleSurfer
· 9h ago
Sounds good, but what about actual implementation? Most people are still being driven by emotions.
Wait, are institutions really quietly making moves? Or is this just another round of cutting the leeks?
Systematic investing sounds great, but I just want to ask, who is going to provide it?
Compliance, transparency, auditability... Well, here we go again, just making empty promises.
Hold on, those projects claiming to have stable systems, why do they collapse the fastest?
View OriginalReply0
GmGnSleeper
· 10h ago
The idea of institutional involvement has been heard too many times, but the reality is that retail investors still chase highs and sell lows, and that can't be changed.
Systematic profit-making sounds great, but how many can stick to it and execute consistently?
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretter
· 10h ago
Haha, that's not entirely wrong, but it's not that absolute either. Retail investors are most likely to get caught when hearing this kind of talk.
View OriginalReply0
ExpectationFarmer
· 10h ago
After all this talk, it's still the same story. Are institutions really following the rules obediently? I doubt it.
No matter how good the system is, someone has to execute it. The question is, you see,
Compliance frameworks sound safe, but they can be bypassed in a flash.
Data can be deceptive, it's just that no one admits it.
This set of theories is most comfortable in a bear market; when the wind turns, it's a different story.
Isn't institutional entry just about bottom fishing? Don't overcomplicate it.
It’s auditable and transparent, so why are there still so many dark secrets?
Is alpha within the system? I think it’s whoever can escape the fastest.
True alpha is not found in emotionally driven areas, but in rational systems.
What can AI tools do? Scan the entire market and capture those undervalued signals — not relying on intuition, but on verifiable data. A recent sign worth noting: institutional funds are quietly entering the market. They are not chasing hot trends or hyping narratives, but instead seeking the most robust and reliable systems.
What does this indicate? Emotions are market noise. Genuine signals come from three things: compliance frameworks, certainty, and repeatable, verifiable processes. Stories that profit from FOMO are outdated; now, large capital focuses on mechanisms with controllable risks and clear underlying logic.
In this shift, whoever can provide such systems — transparent, stable, and auditable — will secure the next round of chips.