Haven's new project has been making significant moves recently, with a $30 million seed round funding just secured, and well-known institutions like Candaq entering the scene. What are they aiming to do? Simply put, they want to make the on-chain fixed income market more transparent and more programmable.
Currently, Haven has launched a US Treasury product, allowing users to access the on-chain yield mechanism directly using USDT, USDC, or USD1. This approach actually hits many pain points—traditional low-volatility assets have always been somewhat "cold" and often require complex channels to participate. Now, there's a pathway to bring these assets onto the chain, enabling ordinary users to access them.
The RWA (Real World Assets) track has been quite hot lately, from US Treasuries to commodities and various traditional financial products. Everyone is trying to use blockchain to transform these markets. Haven's idea is to build the foundational layer for on-chain fixed income, allowing more DeFi products to be built on top of it.
Honestly, the core appeal of projects like this is—they are truly integrating traditional finance with Web3. It's not just hype; they are genuinely changing how assets flow and how transactions are conducted. But with investment institutions so active, they also need to consider: how big is the current market demand for on-chain fixed income? How will regulators view this? These are questions that need time to verify. What do you think about this direction?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SignatureVerifier
· 11h ago
ngl the "real world asset" pitch gets recycled every bull cycle... technically speaking, where's the actual custody validation here? haven't seen sufficient auditing on their treasury mechanics yet.
Reply0
MetaMisfit
· 11h ago
Another RWA project is here. Whether it can truly solve problems depends on what happens next.
View OriginalReply0
NervousFingers
· 11h ago
The idea of tokenizing US Treasury bonds sounds good, but I still have some doubts. A $30 million funding round can definitely attract attention, but where is the real user demand?
View OriginalReply0
LootboxPhobia
· 11h ago
This wave of RWA is real, but whether Haven can break through still depends on subsequent execution. The 30 million funding is indeed substantial, but I'm worried it might just be another conceptual game.
View OriginalReply0
HorizonHunter
· 11h ago
Tokenizing government bonds sounds good, but I'm worried it might just be another hype concept.
Haven's new project has been making significant moves recently, with a $30 million seed round funding just secured, and well-known institutions like Candaq entering the scene. What are they aiming to do? Simply put, they want to make the on-chain fixed income market more transparent and more programmable.
Currently, Haven has launched a US Treasury product, allowing users to access the on-chain yield mechanism directly using USDT, USDC, or USD1. This approach actually hits many pain points—traditional low-volatility assets have always been somewhat "cold" and often require complex channels to participate. Now, there's a pathway to bring these assets onto the chain, enabling ordinary users to access them.
The RWA (Real World Assets) track has been quite hot lately, from US Treasuries to commodities and various traditional financial products. Everyone is trying to use blockchain to transform these markets. Haven's idea is to build the foundational layer for on-chain fixed income, allowing more DeFi products to be built on top of it.
Honestly, the core appeal of projects like this is—they are truly integrating traditional finance with Web3. It's not just hype; they are genuinely changing how assets flow and how transactions are conducted. But with investment institutions so active, they also need to consider: how big is the current market demand for on-chain fixed income? How will regulators view this? These are questions that need time to verify. What do you think about this direction?