A founder of a major exchange has recently been very active, directly investing over $2 million in ASTER. This is not a small test. At the same time, ASTER is also not idle—on the protocol level, a "continuous buyback and burn" mechanism has been launched, with 80% of the platform's daily revenue used for market buybacks, which are then burned immediately.
What does this combination of tactics mean?
First, the big player's real money bets naturally attract attention, and market interest is rising rapidly. Second, the deflation engine has been activated— as long as the protocol generates income, buyback and burn will happen automatically without manual intervention. Furthermore, this creates a positive feedback loop: trading volume increases → protocol revenue grows → the amount of ASTER burned daily increases → circulating supply gradually shrinks → supply-side pressure weakens.
It sounds wonderful, but a calm analysis must say: the sustainability of this model entirely depends on whether the protocol can continue to generate genuine income. The effects of burning need time to verify, and short-term market fluctuations are inevitable. Investors optimistic about this "big player backing + deflation mechanism" combination believe that buyback and burn can build real value support. However, any project must undergo market testing; risks and opportunities always come hand in hand.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RektRecorder
· 4h ago
Big shot spends 2 million just to pump the market? I think he's just digging his own grave.
Wait, 80% buyback and burn? That's a pretty aggressive number. Isn't he afraid of destroying himself?
The logic of burning sounds great, but what if the protocol has no income that day? It'll be awkward then.
Real money can indeed be impressive, but I want to see if trading volume can really pick up.
Another buyback and burn, feels like gambling on market sentiment.
Revenue is the key. Without a sustainable cash flow, it's just a house of cards.
Honestly, it still depends on whether stable income can be generated later; otherwise, everything is pointless.
This move is indeed a bit aggressive. Short-term rise, but what about long-term? Let's see.
View OriginalReply0
UncleWhale
· 4h ago
The big shot's money-spreading move is indeed aggressive, but can 2 million really support this wave of deflation narrative?
This buyback and burn mechanism sounds good, but the key is whether the protocol itself is profitable.
It's always the big shots backing it and burning tokens, feels a bit familiar...
Deflation is deflation, but the premise is that there must be real trading volume, brother.
The relay problem in the secondary market is always the biggest pitfall.
How far this strategy can go depends entirely on whether the income can be stable. I'll wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
DAOTruant
· 4h ago
Spending 2 million is indeed a bit aggressive, but this destruction mechanism really needs to generate revenue to be effective.
View OriginalReply0
POAPlectionist
· 4h ago
2 million USD invested, this move is indeed aggressive. However, the success of the buyback and burn depends on whether the subsequent trading volume can support it. If the transaction volume doesn't increase, burning money would be pointless.
View OriginalReply0
SelfSovereignSteve
· 4h ago
Big boss, this move is really bold. Investing 2 million shows you have a clear plan in mind.
A founder of a major exchange has recently been very active, directly investing over $2 million in ASTER. This is not a small test. At the same time, ASTER is also not idle—on the protocol level, a "continuous buyback and burn" mechanism has been launched, with 80% of the platform's daily revenue used for market buybacks, which are then burned immediately.
What does this combination of tactics mean?
First, the big player's real money bets naturally attract attention, and market interest is rising rapidly. Second, the deflation engine has been activated— as long as the protocol generates income, buyback and burn will happen automatically without manual intervention. Furthermore, this creates a positive feedback loop: trading volume increases → protocol revenue grows → the amount of ASTER burned daily increases → circulating supply gradually shrinks → supply-side pressure weakens.
It sounds wonderful, but a calm analysis must say: the sustainability of this model entirely depends on whether the protocol can continue to generate genuine income. The effects of burning need time to verify, and short-term market fluctuations are inevitable. Investors optimistic about this "big player backing + deflation mechanism" combination believe that buyback and burn can build real value support. However, any project must undergo market testing; risks and opportunities always come hand in hand.