BTC Trend Evolution Analysis



From the current trend, Bitcoin is below the key trendline and overall weak. This period of "sideways movement + drawing gates" essentially means that in an environment of liquidity exhaustion, the market is exchanging chips.

The four-hour timeframe has already broken below the upward channel and entered a new "inside bar" structure. From a purely technical perspective, there are two core evolution logic:

The first is the standard divergence pattern. Entry phase → Central oscillation → Breakaway phase → Secondary central zone → Divergence phase. This is the typical path of four-hour divergence in the central zone. If a double bottom divergence resonance occurs on both the daily and four-hour levels, it could potentially form a relatively explosive weekly rebound. The core logic is simple: the bearish momentum is exhausted, and the final dip is completed.

The second is the bottoming process. Continuous sideways movement and drawing gates aim to exhaust the pressure of the trendline. However, the risk of this approach is that it may not be a true reversal but rather an upgrade of the structure. Since there has been no deep washout, the upward space is easily constrained by dense selling pressure above. This can easily evolve into "space for time," leading to a secondary bottom test. Therefore, the key is to monitor whether the pressure levels are effectively suppressed to prevent false breakouts.

Practical trading advice is as follows: Lock in the window period from January to February 2026. The current strategy is to wait for the establishment of a bottom divergence at the same level. In one sentence: the market makers are "grinding," and we are just "waiting." Wait for the structure to complete and for the double divergence resonance signal to appear, then plan for a weekly-level rebound.
BTC0,62%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SelfMadeRuggeevip
· 12h ago
Bottoming out or a second double bottom? The key is whether the resistance level can hold. Wait, is the logic of double divergence resonance reliable? Feels like it's always said this way. The market makers keep us waiting, sounds reasonable but in reality, it often suddenly reverses. Rather than waiting for signals, it's better to set a stop-loss first.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMuskRatvip
· 13h ago
Bottoming out or a double bottom, these two patterns are very different. Can you be sure you're not fooling yourself?
View OriginalReply0
mev_me_maybevip
· 13h ago
Bottoming out or a double bottom, this is the most critical point... Just looking at the four-hour divergence signals isn't enough; we need to wait for dual resonance confirmation before jumping in.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaBrainvip
· 13h ago
Bottoming out or a false breakout, it all depends on whether the resistance level can hold. It feels like there's a pretty high risk of a second bottom test.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)