A shallow idea about a certain well-known DEX token. The current situation is as follows — approximately 150,000 tokens are newly issued each week, while about 600,000 are bought back and burned, resulting in a net deflation of about 450,000 tokens per week. In other words, this token is actually decreasing week by week, not increasing.

Some say it has an infinite issuance mechanism. That's correct, technically. But the key point is this: the volume of buybacks and burns far exceeds the issuance, which is the core logic. At the current pace, the model itself is feasible.

However, I want to raise a question — if new token issuance stops, could we change the approach? Allocate 150,000 from the 600,000 weekly buyback quota to subsidize liquidity mining, and continue burning the remaining 450,000. This way, the token would truly achieve both zero new issuance and continuous deflation. Is this worth considering?