Last night's crypto market once again staged a thrilling drama. A self-proclaimed veteran player, frequently showcasing million-dollar-scale altcoin holdings, a "well-known figure," experienced the entire process of $PIPPIN trading—from resisting liquidation, adding to positions, to ultimately being liquidated for 5 million USD. The whole process resembled a carefully scripted soap opera, but the ending was brutally laid out in front of everyone.
What’s even more heartbreaking is that this market evolution turned into a true double kill—no matter which side contract traders bet on, the result was the same: liquidation. A harsh market truth was thus fully exposed: those "whale" large holdings displays are nine times out of ten just traps to lure retail investors into the market.
When narratives can be arbitrarily manipulated and candlestick charts can be artificially "drawn," what is there left for retail investors to trust?
**Experienced veteran traders know very well**
A fundamental rule runs through the entire market: large holdings, especially those involving small-cap coins, are always kept absolutely secret. Actively "showing off" positions publicly usually falls into these categories:
**The first and most common is—it's very convenient for attracting follow-on orders to sell off.** When your positions become an open "target," you completely lose control and become the perfect prey for snipers.
**The second is seeking community consensus to pump the price, but the risks are extremely high.** Such operations often end in tragedy.
**The third is pure arrogance and ignorance.**
The $PIPPIN incident perfectly exemplifies the first pattern. Once the positions are made public, control no longer belongs to the holder.
**The problem isn’t the market itself, but whom we choose to trust**
After experiencing many lessons like this, more and more participants are adjusting their strategies. Instead of fixating on the movements of some "big shot," it’s better to focus on underlying protocols that embed "decentralization" and "transparency" into their DNA. These on-chain mechanisms ensure the verifiability of the rules of the game—no one can arbitrarily tamper with them, and there’s no room for "showing off" with obvious signals.
Retail investors who want to survive longer must do one thing: forget all the halos of "big shots" and only trust what can be verified and cannot be manipulated.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AllInAlice
· 6h ago
Betting everything with 5 million in one go—that's the information gap. What we see is all what they want us to see.
Showing off positions is never good, really.
On-chain data is the real deal; everything else is just stories.
Showing off holdings = setting a trap. This logic is becoming clearer and clearer.
Only decentralized things can be trusted; everything else is an illusion.
Anyone still following big V influencers should wake up.
This PIPPIN incident has been a lesson. Anyone who still believes in showing off holdings is just being foolish.
Never follow the big positions of small coins; remember that.
View OriginalReply0
SelfStaking
· 6h ago
Another "expert" showing off their position has crashed, so real
---
5 million USD just gone, I feel embarrassed for him
---
Basically, it's a trap. Retail investors should wake up
---
Decentralized protocols are the only trustworthy things; everything else is虚
---
Large holdings openly disclosed? Are you crazy?
---
I've seen too many cases of long and short double kills
---
Trusting "experts" is not as good as trusting the chain. Now I finally understand
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 6h ago
Another fool showing off their position got wiped out again, this script is so familiar
Wait, did this guy really lose 5 million or is he just acting again
There's nothing to learn from these big influencers, it's better to study on-chain data for real insights
By the way, who still believes in position shows? It's already 2024
I just want to know when the next bag-holder will appear
That's why I insist on doing my own research and not looking at anyone's holdings
Both longs and shorts get liquidated, the market is really rotten, it's more reliable to study protocols
The master persona collapses so quickly, yesterday was an expert, today he's just a leek
Honestly, only on-chain verifiable stuff is worth playing with, everything else is gambling
Contracts are inherently a game of death, don't blame the market, blame yourself
Last night's crypto market once again staged a thrilling drama. A self-proclaimed veteran player, frequently showcasing million-dollar-scale altcoin holdings, a "well-known figure," experienced the entire process of $PIPPIN trading—from resisting liquidation, adding to positions, to ultimately being liquidated for 5 million USD. The whole process resembled a carefully scripted soap opera, but the ending was brutally laid out in front of everyone.
What’s even more heartbreaking is that this market evolution turned into a true double kill—no matter which side contract traders bet on, the result was the same: liquidation. A harsh market truth was thus fully exposed: those "whale" large holdings displays are nine times out of ten just traps to lure retail investors into the market.
When narratives can be arbitrarily manipulated and candlestick charts can be artificially "drawn," what is there left for retail investors to trust?
**Experienced veteran traders know very well**
A fundamental rule runs through the entire market: large holdings, especially those involving small-cap coins, are always kept absolutely secret. Actively "showing off" positions publicly usually falls into these categories:
**The first and most common is—it's very convenient for attracting follow-on orders to sell off.** When your positions become an open "target," you completely lose control and become the perfect prey for snipers.
**The second is seeking community consensus to pump the price, but the risks are extremely high.** Such operations often end in tragedy.
**The third is pure arrogance and ignorance.**
The $PIPPIN incident perfectly exemplifies the first pattern. Once the positions are made public, control no longer belongs to the holder.
**The problem isn’t the market itself, but whom we choose to trust**
After experiencing many lessons like this, more and more participants are adjusting their strategies. Instead of fixating on the movements of some "big shot," it’s better to focus on underlying protocols that embed "decentralization" and "transparency" into their DNA. These on-chain mechanisms ensure the verifiability of the rules of the game—no one can arbitrarily tamper with them, and there’s no room for "showing off" with obvious signals.
Retail investors who want to survive longer must do one thing: forget all the halos of "big shots" and only trust what can be verified and cannot be manipulated.