Self Chain founder: Increasing Token supply aims to strengthen network security

DailyNews
X1,82%
ATOM-0,64%

Odaily Planet Daily News According to the recent community concerns about the ‘increase in Token supply’, Ravindra Kumar, the founder and CEO of Self Chain, responded to the doubts and fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD) faced by the project after migrating from FRONT to SLF on the X platform. Kumar emphasized that Self Chain is not a new team taking over, but the original team has undergone strategic reshaping, expanding from the Wallet project to a Layer 1 blockchain based on Cosmos-SDK. Regarding the increase in token supply, Kumar explained the allocation of the total supply of 360 million: 36 million permanently locked for the foundation’s node, 90 million migrated from FRONT to SLF, 10 million allocated to new investors as validators (18-month lock-up period), 36 million allocated to equity investors (36-month lock-up period), 30 million allocated to the core team (6-year lock-up period), and 68 million for the ecosystem (released 1.5 million per month). Kumar stated that increasing the supply aims to enhance network security, prevent 51% Attack, and attract more investors and validators to participate.

View Original
Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
GateUser-4181e832vip
· 2024-09-22 07:26
bull rebounding speed 🐂
View OriginalReply0