Comment: AI writes the year-end summary, and the hidden concerns behind the monthly sales of 60,000 orders

According to media reports a few days ago, searching for keywords such as "year-end summary AI" on a shopping platform, there are many related products, and some stores even have monthly sales of more than 60,000 orders, and they have also received a lot of praise.

In this regard, a commentator from Beijing Daily issued an article saying that the original intention of all units and companies to set the year-end summary is to check and fill in the gaps, summarize experience, and improve the quality and efficiency of the work through the review of the work of the old year and the outlook for the new year's arrangement. The value of a year-end summary depends largely on how attentive an individual is. In this sense, whether it is AI ghostwriting or asking someone to catch a knife, once there is a lack of personal thinking, no matter how gorgeous the final rhetoric is, no matter how bluffing the form is, and it lacks the core, it must not be as good as your own hard writing. On the other hand, if you are just cobbling things together and coping with things, you may not be able to write about AI.

From AI drawing to writing essays, to PPT and copywriting, this is not the first time that AI has caused controversy. The core of the controversy is incomparably unanimous, that is: will AI replace human thinking, or weaken human thinking and innovation, resulting in AI being highly intelligent, but humans becoming less and less intelligent? On second thought, this general concern and cautiousness itself is where humans have an advantage over algorithms. For advanced products such as AI, you don't have to treat it as a flood beast, you can give full play to its advantages, enjoy its convenience and efficiency, but also soberly draw boundaries. Just as there is no need to equate the use of AI with inertia, this cautious attitude will certainly make us embrace new technologies more rationally.