As Capitol Hill advances its work on market structure legislation, the industry has an important moment to ensure any framework reflects its core values and explicitly protects DeFi and open innovation. Just as important is advocating for ideas that have yet to be created, and startups in their earliest stages whose voices might be overlooked.
We’ve developed these proposed principles for market structure legislation to articulate in plain English how DeFi might be defined in legislation. They’re designed to bridge the gap between the crypto community and policymakers, and we’re opening them to community input to strengthen their accuracy and impact.
Your perspective matters – use this form to tell us what works and what we might have missed in our approach.
Any market structure legislation that seeks to protect DeFi should:
In policymaking, a term sheet details the core components and objectives of a proposed law to help guide the legislative drafting process. The principles outlined in this document were developed using the 2023 version of the Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act as our analytical foundation. We selected this bill because of its clear division of tokens between securities and commodities. That legislation also established regulatory requirements for centralized crypto exchanges (under both CFTC and SEC regulation), protections for consumers, and coordination between agencies on crypto regulation.
This article is reprinted from [Paradigm]. All copyrights belong to the original author [Paradigm Policy Team]. If there are objections to this reprint, please contact the Gate Learn team, and they will handle it promptly.
Liability Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not constitute any investment advice.
Translations of the article into other languages are done by the Gate Learn team. Unless mentioned, copying, distributing, or plagiarizing the translated articles is prohibited.
As Capitol Hill advances its work on market structure legislation, the industry has an important moment to ensure any framework reflects its core values and explicitly protects DeFi and open innovation. Just as important is advocating for ideas that have yet to be created, and startups in their earliest stages whose voices might be overlooked.
We’ve developed these proposed principles for market structure legislation to articulate in plain English how DeFi might be defined in legislation. They’re designed to bridge the gap between the crypto community and policymakers, and we’re opening them to community input to strengthen their accuracy and impact.
Your perspective matters – use this form to tell us what works and what we might have missed in our approach.
Any market structure legislation that seeks to protect DeFi should:
In policymaking, a term sheet details the core components and objectives of a proposed law to help guide the legislative drafting process. The principles outlined in this document were developed using the 2023 version of the Lummis-Gillibrand Responsible Financial Innovation Act as our analytical foundation. We selected this bill because of its clear division of tokens between securities and commodities. That legislation also established regulatory requirements for centralized crypto exchanges (under both CFTC and SEC regulation), protections for consumers, and coordination between agencies on crypto regulation.
This article is reprinted from [Paradigm]. All copyrights belong to the original author [Paradigm Policy Team]. If there are objections to this reprint, please contact the Gate Learn team, and they will handle it promptly.
Liability Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not constitute any investment advice.
Translations of the article into other languages are done by the Gate Learn team. Unless mentioned, copying, distributing, or plagiarizing the translated articles is prohibited.