$PI Many so-called veteran pioneers in the community have persisted for six or seven years, four or five years, two or three years. When they lose money on exchanges, they speak ill of the project in every way, and humiliate and curse the project founders and co-founders. Their character is truly poor. Mining is voluntary, right? Even if the project team drew a pie that couldn't be eaten, and only now wake up to it, does that mean their IQ is completely insufficient? If someone participates in nodes or the ecosystem, it's also voluntary, right? Even if they were scammed, it's because of their greed. If they put real money into exchanges and lost it, it's also because of their greed—wanting more or acting impulsively. Many might have already migrated their assets elsewhere and are just hoarding coins or trading on exchanges. If they control their greed and honestly do zero-profit mining, just light up the lightning, and don't spend a penny, no one can cut them off. Some newcomers say they can't mine much, but there's no way around it. If you didn't participate early, you have to bear the risk of holding coins or trading. If you make money, do you donate it to the project? If you lose money, do you blame the project? Risk is always proportional to profit. I also entered at $2.73 and did some swing trading, trying to squeeze more wool, and I also experienced liquidation in futures. Aren't these all personal choices? We're all adults, responsible for our own actions. When problems arise, is it someone else's fault? Isn't that embarrassing?