2025-12-07 17:21:30

Caught the rebound around 896 on BTC and rolled two positions accordingly. The strategy is very clear now: if it breaks above 91,000, I’ll admit defeat and exit; if it drops below 850, I’ll wait for a rebound signal before looking for another opportunity to go in.

For me, this round is a chance to reshuffle the deck. No destruction, no creation—consider it the last lesson I’m giving myself. Hope those temporarily quiet brothers can make a comeback. See you all at the top!

BTC-1.11%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnChain_Detective

· 2h ago

wait hold up... let me pull the data on this price action around 896. pattern analysis suggests these liquidation cascades aren't random, tbh. flagged some suspicious wallet clustering right before your "bounce" — statistical anomaly that keeps repeating. not saying rugpull vibes but... always DYOR folks, high-risk indicators are literally screaming rn

Reply0

GigaBrainAnon

· 12-07 17:51

That 896 move was really fierce, and the way you rolled your positions was impressive. But I still think the key level at 850 has to hold—if it breaks, we’ll need to reassess the whole strategy. Good luck, brother, see you at the top.

View OriginalReply0

SellLowExpert

· 12-07 17:50

I didn't catch that 896 rebound either, it's really unbelievable. Your stop-loss points are set pretty clearly, much better than mine haha.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropCollector

· 12-07 17:49

Rebound at 896 and then get out? You've got guts, man. Can this wave hold up to 9.1?

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 12-07 17:48

The position of 896 is really amazing, just like the thrill of buying the bottom in a liquidity pool. I have to give you a thumbs up for this wave of operations, which are indeed much more rational than those studs.

View OriginalReply0

Tokenomics911