Anyone tracked which NFT profile pictures see the best and worst holder loyalty? Like, who's actually sticking with their PFP versus flipping to something new?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleShadow
· 16h ago
Eh, that's an interesting question... It feels like those that are absurdly expensive from the start are actually the ones nobody holds, since they're destined to crash anyway.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractWorker
· 22h ago
It depends on whether the project team actually provides any real benefits to holders. PFPs without utility should have been replaced long ago.
View OriginalReply0
SelfRugger
· 22h ago
To be honest, there's no point in tracking this. It's all just a scheme to fleece the newcomers anyway, so who really cares?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 22h ago
nah this is where the real alpha lives... you can literally backrun pfp migration patterns if you catch the mempool timing right. watched three bored apes dump yesterday before the holder officially switched - that's not coincidence fr
Reply0
TokenVelocity
· 22h ago
This question is spot on. It feels like after Blur, no one is truly loyal anymore—everyone is just frantically flipping.
View OriginalReply0
DefiVeteran
· 22h ago
To be honest, 99% are just flipping, no one is truly loyal.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationWatcher
· 22h ago
Nah, seriously, most people are paper hands. When they're optimistic, they hype it up, but as soon as it drops, they dump it... From what I've observed, the retention rate of blue chips is actually just so-so. Don’t be fooled by the data.
Anyone tracked which NFT profile pictures see the best and worst holder loyalty? Like, who's actually sticking with their PFP versus flipping to something new?