Why Australia Became a Crypto Compliance “Benchmark” in 2025: A Comprehensive Look at Its New Digital Asset Regulatory Bill

Regulatory Background of the New Era: Why the Encryption Industry Needs Compliance

In recent years, the cryptocurrency industry has experienced rapid growth, but along with it have come risks such as improper custody, liquidity breaks, exchange failures, and damage to user assets. Several well-known cases in the past have exposed the shortcomings of the industry’s structure and regulatory systems. To prevent history from repeating itself, protect consumer rights, and truly integrate digital assets into the mainstream financial system, regulation has become an inevitable choice.

Based on this, the Australian government submitted the “Corporations Amendment (Digital Asset Framework) Bill” in November 2025, aiming to incorporate businesses representing clients holding digital assets into the financial services regulatory system.

Bill Highlights: digital asset platform + token custody platform + AFSL license + exemption mechanism

The core of the new legislation is the definition and regulation of “digital asset platforms (Digital Asset Platform, DAP)” and “tokenized custody platforms (Tokenized Custody Platform, TCP)”. DAP covers platforms that hold customers’ encryption assets and provide functions such as trading, transferring, and staking; TCP, on the other hand, is for custody services after the tokenization of real assets.

To operate legally, both types of platforms must obtain an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL) and comply with the custody and settlement standards established by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), ensuring asset safety, transparent transaction settlement, and standardized execution of customer instructions.

Considering the innovation and entrepreneurial vitality of the industry, the bill also sets up an exemption mechanism: platforms with individual client assets below $5,000 and annual trading volumes below $10,000,000 may be exempt from full licensing requirements. This move aims to balance regulation with innovation, taking into account market vitality and risk prevention.

In addition, the bill establishes a strict penalty mechanism: for non-compliant platforms, hefty fines may be imposed or penalties may be based on the proportion of annual revenue to curb malicious or negligent behavior.

Market Impact: Compliance vs Non-compliance Platform Differentiation

With the implementation of new regulations, the market will show significant differentiation: compliant platforms will gain legal status and trust endorsement, while non-compliant platforms will face expulsion or relocation. Many encryption exchanges and custody service providers will accelerate their license applications, restructure business processes, and enhance safety and transparency standards.

For compliant platforms, this means potentially gaining more institutional capital, trust and investment from pension funds and traditional financial users, driving the “mainstreaming” and “institutionalization” of the encryption asset market. This trend is not limited to Australia but will also have a demonstration effect on the global encryption market.

The significance for investors and institutions

For ordinary investors, the new regulations bring a more stable, transparent, and protected environment. Asset custody has legal protection, platform operations are more standardized, and the trading process is more transparent. This reduces the risk of “踩雷” due to platform closures and improper custody.

For institutional investors, funds, pensions, or traditional financial institutions, this represents a “pass” into the encryption market. With a clear compliance framework, institutions can participate in digital asset investment more confidently, promoting the assetization, institutionalization, and mainstreaming of digital assets.

Predictions and Suggestions for Future Trends

As Australia becomes the first country to implement such a comprehensive regulatory framework, other countries are likely to follow suit and introduce similar systems. Compliance and transparency will become the new standards in the industry. Digital assets will increasingly be seen as a “legitimate asset class” rather than just “high-risk speculative instruments.”

For investors and platforms, it is recommended to closely monitor the compliance process. Platforms should apply for licenses as early as possible and standardize custody and trading processes; investors should prioritize licensed and compliant platforms to reduce risks.