Currently, not many people are aware, but I come from a technical background. Twenty years ago, at an investment bank in the Asia-Pacific region, there were probably about fifty people who truly understood algorithmic trading, and I was one of them; at that time, the core of the system was not just "functioning," but had to be reliable in the long term under constraints such as latency, stability, monitoring, and risk control. Therefore, I was initially very opposed to "Vibe Coding," because it could easily lead people to misunderstand that programming could be done by "giving instructions based on feelings." Later, I personally used Claude Code, Codex, and Copilot to create some small software and internal tools, and I realized that the issue was not with AI writing code, but with the misleading nature of this term: when AI is integrated into the engineering process, it is more like an extension of pair programming, combining "production" and "review" into a single cycle, allowing people to shift their attention.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin