Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
The SEC Authorizes Direct Trading of Security Tokens Against Bitcoin and Other Crypto Assets
The new guidance issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Trading and Markets marks a significant shift in how federal securities laws are interpreted regarding cryptocurrency trading. Security tokens, digital assets representing ownership or rights within the blockchain ecosystem, can now be traded directly against Bitcoin and other digital assets without first converting them into fiat currency.
Although the SEC did not introduce new formal rules, its updated stance clarifies that it will not oppose certain crypto trading models as long as companies continue to comply with existing federal securities laws. This clarification covers multiple operational aspects: from trading mechanisms and capital calculations to disclosure standards and special considerations for exchange-traded products.
Direct Peer-to-Peer Digital Asset Trading
A key advancement in the new guidance is the explicit permission for national securities exchanges and alternative trading systems (ATS) to facilitate direct transactions between a security token and a non-security crypto asset, such as Bitcoin. This represents a significant practical change: operators can now process pair trades without needing to settle in U.S. dollars as an intermediate step.
However, the SEC emphasized that this operational flexibility does not exempt platforms from their fundamental regulatory obligations. ATS must maintain their recordkeeping and reporting responsibilities under Regulation ATS. Additionally, when trades are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, firms must convert the securities to USD for reporting purposes. The critical point is that any conversion method must be applied consistently, fairly, and based on reasonable criteria.
Capital Treatment and Operational Flexibility
Regarding capital requirements for broker-dealers under Rule 15c3-1, the Division stated it would not oppose considering proprietary holdings in stablecoins as readily negotiable. This means that when calculating net capital, firms can apply a 2% discount to the market value of their stablecoin positions, whether long or short.
An equally important operational aspect is the combination of functions within a single broker-dealer. The SEC permits a firm operating an alternative trading system to perform custody, brokerage, or clearing roles simultaneously. Each function, however, must independently meet its regulatory obligations. This flexibility allows companies to optimize their operational models while maintaining clear segregation of responsibilities.
Furthermore, the Division clarified that a broker-dealer will not need to register separately as a clearing agency when it clears and settles client transactions as part of its regular brokerage activities. This interpretation helps clearly delineate where brokerage ends and where the special responsibilities of a clearing agency begin.
Transparent Disclosure and Frameworks for Listed Products
The new guidance states that disclosures related to crypto asset transactions that constitute securities can be made via Form ATS or Form ATS-N. Platforms must specifically describe differences in subscriber access, onboarding procedures, settlement processes, and trading mechanisms related to crypto activities, including arrangements for specialized peer-to-peer trades.
For cryptocurrency exchange-traded products (ETPs), the SEC aligned with principles similar to those in the 2006 no-action letter to commodity-based investment vehicles. This means it would not oppose transactions in cryptocurrency ETP shares under similar circumstances, provided these shares are listed on a national securities exchange and participants avoid conduct that violates Rule M outside of a permitted distribution.
Impact on Security Token Trading
The consolidated guidance does not substantially alter the existing regulatory framework but provides interpretive clarity on how current federal securities laws apply to emerging operational structures in the digital asset space. For security tokens, this means greater certainty when trading against Bitcoin and other crypto assets on regulated platforms, with more predictable capital procedures and clearer disclosure rules.
The overall result is a more permissive regulatory environment without sacrificing oversight: companies better understand the boundaries of what is allowed and can design complex operations knowing they comply with federal standards. This clarity is likely to accelerate innovation in crypto trading structures while strengthening institutional investor confidence in security token markets.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. The opinions expressed reflect general analysis and do not represent institutional positions. It is recommended to conduct thorough research and consult with specialized advisors before making investment decisions.