2026-01-12 03:30:32

A suggestion regarding the crypto API: could it consider native support for Solana? Currently, users can access the Solana ecosystem through cross-chain bridging via a self-built relayer client on the Base network. The workflow is functional and the experience is quite good. However, it would be ideal if Solana support could be directly integrated at the API level—this way, developers wouldn't need to create intermediary layers, and the user experience would be smoother. Solana's advantages in high-frequency trading and low-cost scenarios are already well recognized, and I believe native integration would open up more possibilities for API users. Looking forward to seeing progress in this direction.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ConsensusDissenter

· 01-15 02:51

Supporting Solana native is indeed something that should be prioritized now. Currently, this middleware solution is quite convoluted.

View OriginalReply0

just_another_wallet

· 01-15 02:30

Adding Solana support directly is indeed something that should be scheduled. It's too troublesome to keep messing around with the relayer.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 01-13 05:39

Solana native support for this has long been overdue. Now, going through relay is indeed unnecessary. Integrating directly at the API layer would significantly improve the development experience, saving the trouble of setting up infrastructure each time. When it comes to low gas fees, Solana is truly the chosen one. High-frequency trading is its true stage.

View OriginalReply0

ShibaSunglasses

· 01-12 03:56

Solana native support should have been implemented long ago; this workaround is too convoluted now.

View OriginalReply0

AllTalkLongTrader

· 01-12 03:54

+1, Solana's low fees are so attractive. Now, all the extra costs come from unnecessary detours. How much hassle could be saved by direct integration?

View OriginalReply0

rugdoc.eth

· 01-12 03:53

Bro, I get this requirement now. Supporting SOL directly at the API layer is indeed awesome, saving us from building an intermediary layer ourselves. --- Solana's TPS and fees truly outperform other chains. Native integration would make the development experience much smoother. --- This suggestion is good, but the question is who will do it... Probably have to wait until someone really pushes this forward. --- If the relayer client setup can run smoothly, it shows the approach is correct. Now it's just waiting for the official to step in. Let's push them. --- In low-cost, high-frequency trading scenarios, Solana is indeed unbeatable. API support would unlock many new ways to play. --- Exactly, native support would save a lot of adaptation trouble. We developers are eager for that. --- A smooth experience is the core requirement. Just eliminating the intermediary layer makes it worth it.

View OriginalReply0

FancyResearchLab

· 01-12 03:43

Haha, here comes another "theoretically feasible" request... Let me try this smart trap first.

View OriginalReply0

4am_degen