As a technical professional who has worked in traditional financial institutions for many years, I was a bit surprised the first time I encountered Dusk's technical solution. Unlike many public blockchains that just throw a bunch of academic concepts at you, this project has made financial compliance and privacy protection ready to use out of the box. In simple terms, it's like someone has already cut and prepared all the ingredients for you; you just need to start cooking. This really reduces the trial-and-error costs for institutional clients—also easing psychological pressure. I believe that this approach of bearing the complexity oneself and leaving simplicity to the user is the true "pioneering" mindset. In an era of following trends and technology, such projects actually seem very clear-headed.

DUSK10.61%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DYORMastervip
· 01-09 21:51
Ah, this line of thinking is indeed refreshing, but whether it can be truly implemented depends on how far compliance can go. --- Out-of-the-box is comfortable to listen to, but I'm afraid you'll still have to pave your own way in the end. --- For people with a traditional financial background, this statement is more convincing, unlike some projects that boast loudly. --- Cutting vegetables doesn't necessarily mean you'll make good dishes; the key is still execution. --- This pragmatic approach is indeed rare, but will institutions really buy in? --- Simplifying processes is correct, but privacy and compliance can easily conflict. --- It's interesting; it all depends on whether the team can fully understand this matter. --- I agree with the statement that taking on complexity yourself, but most projects can't do that. --- Institutional clients' psychological pressure ≠ actual risk; they are two different things. --- Sober projects are indeed scarce, but with the hype cycle returning, who still remembers this?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldminevip
· 01-09 21:43
I truly agree with the point of reducing the cost of trial and error. From an ROI perspective, the lower the psychological pressure for institutions to enter, the shorter the cycle they adopt. This is actually beneficial for the overall ecosystem growth curve.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_watchervip
· 01-09 21:41
Plug-and-play really hit me hard; traditional finance people fear compliance pitfalls the most --- So Dusk really did the work and didn't just pass the buck to institutions with a bunch of theories for them to figure out? --- This is what I want to see—no need for all those fancy concepts --- The ingredients are already prepared; just put them in the pot... Hmm, this is indeed more practical than most public chains --- Reducing trial-and-error costs is truly a necessity for institutions --- But plug-and-play sounds easy, actually doing it is another story --- Sober projects are indeed rare; most are still in the concept hype stage --- Compliance + privacy on both fronts... this is the right path --- How is the feedback from institutional clients? Are there real data? --- If this approach can be sustained, maybe it can really break through
View OriginalReply0
DataBartendervip
· 01-09 21:38
Vegetables are cut and ready to go directly into the pot, this is the way a knowledgeable institution would do it. Dusk's approach is indeed clear-headed, unlike some projects that keep hyping academic papers on paper. Out-of-the-box functionality is no hype; with compliance and privacy sorted out, it can be used. For those coming from traditional finance, this definitely reduces psychological pressure. Nowadays, there are still projects willing to take on complex tasks themselves, which is rare. But on the other hand, will institutional clients really jump on board so quickly? It still depends on actual implementation. Leave the simple things to users, and handle the difficult ones yourself—this is a strategy I agree with, better than those who pass the buck to the community. It's easy to say nice things, but truly achieving out-of-the-box usability is rare; it remains to be seen how things develop.
View OriginalReply0
unrekt.ethvip
· 01-09 21:36
Really? Is the plug-and-play feature implemented so seamlessly? Have you tried it? When actually running, is it also this smooth?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)