The most common pitfalls in the crypto world are often not technical issues, but the word "trust."
A few years ago, superstar Jay Chou fell victim to this—he entrusted his friend Cai Weize to invest in Bitcoin, only for the other party to disappear, resulting in losses of over 100 million New Taiwan Dollars. Similar stories happen every day in the crypto space. These so-called "trusted third-party investments" seem simple: you send the money, a friend manages the trades, and profits are shared. But the problem is that most of these arrangements are only based on verbal agreements, making it impossible to hold anyone accountable if something goes wrong.
Why are delegated investments so prone to problems? Essentially, it's an incentive mechanism issue. The trader doesn't care whether you profit or lose; they take a 30%-40% commission from the profits. If you lose money? That's your problem. Under this model, traders have no constraints to operate conservatively and are more likely to take risks. Ultimately, the entrusted party bears 100% of the risk and losses.
There are also so-called "gurus' predictions" and "signal providers." Short-term market movements are inherently unpredictable, but these individuals still dare to boast. Their common tactic is to highlight successful predictions repeatedly, creating the illusion that they have special insight. In reality? Some analysts even cooperate with market manipulators, promoting "hundredfold coins" while quietly selling off their holdings.
To protect yourself, you must rely on your own judgment. First, avoid blindly copying trades; learn to make independent assessments. Read project whitepapers, check on-chain data (such as distribution of coin holdings)—these are the real ways to evaluate a coin's true value. Don't be led astray by hype and propaganda.
Second, self-custody of assets is crucial. Store your private keys in a cold wallet and do not grant permissions to third parties casually. If you must delegate, sign formal agreements that clearly specify risk responsibilities and profit-sharing arrangements.
The harsh reality is that the 2025 GUCS virtual currency case alone affected 29,000 people, with losses totaling over 1.7 billion yuan. An expert once said—"There are no true friends in the crypto world, only interests and risks." Instead of trusting others' promises, it's better to trust your own judgment and technical defenses.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaDreamer
· 20h ago
Jay Chou's incident is really a textbook example of a negative case, friends. Still daring to proxy invest?
Losing everything, a verbal agreement is just waste paper, brothers.
The proxy investment commission model is a huge trap. Anyway, since it's not my money, I dare to gamble.
"Expert predictions" make me laugh. When they make money, they post screenshots; when they lose, they delete their accounts. This routine is played out.
Cold wallets are really, really important. Don't authorize them to all kinds of random stuff.
17 billion gone. This is the crypto world, everyone. No friends, only risks.
Managing your own wallet properly is more reliable than anything else.
View OriginalReply0
LayerHopper
· 20h ago
Jay Chou's incident is truly a textbook example of a cautionary tale. How many people still haven't learned?
Proxy investing is a trap; anyone who tries will regret it. I advise you not to think about it.
Signal group teachers? Haha, these people only know how to select samples and fool people like no other.
Manage your own coins; don't skimp on cold wallets—that's really important.
2.9 million people and 1.7 billion yuan. That number makes my scalp tingle. No wonder those who don't read whitepapers are doomed.
Honestly, trust in the crypto world is virtually zero. Even Bitcoin is more reliable than your friends.
View OriginalReply0
hodl_therapist
· 20h ago
Really, Jay Chou's incident is a vivid lesson—trusting acquaintances can be the harshest betrayal.
The commission mechanism for proxy investment was doomed from the start as a zero-sum game; the operator wins while you bear all the risks.
Those "expert predictions" are really laughable. They pick a few correct forecasts and repeatedly boast about being stock gods... I've seen too many cases where they collude with manipulators to dump.
Cold wallets are the most important; never compromise security by handing out private keys just for convenience.
The GUCS case caused many to lose money, yet some still haven't learned their lesson and continue to believe in the "opportunities" shared in social circles.
View OriginalReply0
RektHunter
· 20h ago
Jay Chou's incident is really outrageous; proxy investment in social circles is just a trap.
Proxy commissions of 30-40%... What’s the reason? I lose money, and you still get a share?
I've seen through the sales pitches of the signal providers long ago; they pick a few winning cases to repeatedly hype, it's really funny.
Cold wallets and self-management are the real way; everything else is nonsense.
In the crypto world, there are truly no friends, only risks.
Whitepapers and on-chain data are the only things that can save you; don't trust anyone's words.
The GUCS case... 17 million people and 2.9 million lost directly—that's a lesson.
View OriginalReply0
TokenStorm
· 20h ago
I can still review Jay Chou's case. On-chain data has long shown there were issues, but who would listen? [Dog Head]
The incentive mechanism of the proxy investment model is indeed poison. Under a 30% commission system, no one would honestly do it; sooner or later, they will take risks.
To put it simply, you need to monitor every transaction flow of your wallet address yourself. Cold wallets managed by oneself are the real defense line.
I've seen too many of these schemes. Every time, they first select profitable cases to hype repeatedly, while losing cases are just ignored.
There were early signs in the GUCS case. The distribution of coin-holding addresses clearly indicated major problems, but greed can blind people.
Relying on others' predictions, in the end, are the ones who get harvested. We must admit we are not gambling gods.
The most common pitfalls in the crypto world are often not technical issues, but the word "trust."
A few years ago, superstar Jay Chou fell victim to this—he entrusted his friend Cai Weize to invest in Bitcoin, only for the other party to disappear, resulting in losses of over 100 million New Taiwan Dollars. Similar stories happen every day in the crypto space. These so-called "trusted third-party investments" seem simple: you send the money, a friend manages the trades, and profits are shared. But the problem is that most of these arrangements are only based on verbal agreements, making it impossible to hold anyone accountable if something goes wrong.
Why are delegated investments so prone to problems? Essentially, it's an incentive mechanism issue. The trader doesn't care whether you profit or lose; they take a 30%-40% commission from the profits. If you lose money? That's your problem. Under this model, traders have no constraints to operate conservatively and are more likely to take risks. Ultimately, the entrusted party bears 100% of the risk and losses.
There are also so-called "gurus' predictions" and "signal providers." Short-term market movements are inherently unpredictable, but these individuals still dare to boast. Their common tactic is to highlight successful predictions repeatedly, creating the illusion that they have special insight. In reality? Some analysts even cooperate with market manipulators, promoting "hundredfold coins" while quietly selling off their holdings.
To protect yourself, you must rely on your own judgment. First, avoid blindly copying trades; learn to make independent assessments. Read project whitepapers, check on-chain data (such as distribution of coin holdings)—these are the real ways to evaluate a coin's true value. Don't be led astray by hype and propaganda.
Second, self-custody of assets is crucial. Store your private keys in a cold wallet and do not grant permissions to third parties casually. If you must delegate, sign formal agreements that clearly specify risk responsibilities and profit-sharing arrangements.
The harsh reality is that the 2025 GUCS virtual currency case alone affected 29,000 people, with losses totaling over 1.7 billion yuan. An expert once said—"There are no true friends in the crypto world, only interests and risks." Instead of trusting others' promises, it's better to trust your own judgment and technical defenses.